Section I: Overview
Minister's Message
I am pleased to present the Departmental Performance Report for Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) for the reporting period ending March 31, 2012.
Canada has emerged from the global economic downturn in a strong and competitive position, ready to face the future. Implementation of the Government’s Economic Action Plan helped position the country’s natural resource sectors to increase business investment, create high-paying jobs for Canadians, and contribute to overall economic benefits. Over the past year, Canada’s natural resource sectors played a vital role in our economy. The energy, mining and forest sectors directly and indirectly drive almost 20 percent of Canada’s economic activity. They also provide 10 percent of the jobs in Canada by employing 800,000 Canadians, with an additional 800,000 people employed by industries that service these sectors.
At the moment there are well over 600 major resource projects under way or planned across Canada, representing a potential investment of close to $650 billion over the next 10 years. These projects will benefit communities large and small, and promise jobs, opportunities and better lives for Aboriginal Canadians, for young people looking to start a career in the skilled trades, and for small businesses that support the development of natural resource sectors. With the launch of the plan for Responsible Resource Development, the Government of Canada has moved toward a more effective and efficient regulatory process for these major resource projects. The goal is one project, one review, in a defined timeline. These efforts will help Canada develop its tremendous natural resources for the benefit of Canadians from coast to coast to coast while also strengthening our world-class environmental protection regime.
We have also helped to expand markets and diversify global partnerships by promoting Canada as a responsible and reliable natural resource supplier and by helping wood producers diversify their export markets to key economies, such as China, Japan, India and South Korea. In addition, the Government continued to promote and accelerate energy efficiency activities and the development of innovative energy technologies.
Investments in innovation helped industry to develop new forest products and mining processes and to advance technologies that improve the environmental performance of Canada’s natural resource sectors. In Canada’s North, geo-mapping and geoscience work contributed to prosperity and job creation, particularly in the mining sector. NRCan also provided expertise for Canada’s efforts to support our sovereignty in the Arctic.
I am proud of the integral role NRCan has played this year in advancing the Government’s key priorities particularly as they relate to jobs, growth and long-term prosperity for all Canadians. The Government will continue to secure Canada’s economic and environmental progress through the responsible development of our natural resources.
The Honourable Joe Oliver
Minister of Natural Resources
Section I: Organizational Overview
Raison d’être
NRCan’s vision is to improve the quality of life of Canadians by creating a sustainable resource advantage. It seeks to achieve this vision by working to improve the competitiveness of the natural resource sectors and to grow their contribution to Canada’s economy; by supporting the sustainable development of Canada’s resources in a manner that advances the country’s global standing as a leader on the environment; and by using its knowledge and expertise of Canada’s landmass to support the safety and security of citizens.
Responsibilities
The Minister of Natural Resources is specifically responsible for, or has responsibilities under, more than 30 Acts of Parliament1. The Minister's core powers, duties and functions are set forth in the Department of Natural Resources Act2, the Resources and Technical Surveys Act3, and the Forestry Act4. NRCan also works in areas of shared responsibility with the provinces.
Within the Government of Canada, the Minister of Natural Resources also has responsibilities for the natural resources portfolio5, which includes the following:
-
Atomic Energy of Canada Limited6 (AECL);
-
Two independent regulators: the National Energy Board7 (NEB) and the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission8 (CNSC);
-
Two offshore petroleum boards: the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board9 (CNLOPB) and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board10 (CNSOPB);
- Sustainable Development Technology Canada11 (SDTC), the Energy Supplies Allocation Board12 (ESAB), and the Northern Pipeline Agency13 (NPA).
To deliver on its responsibilities, NRCan relies on a number of tools. It uses science and technology (S&T) to help address priorities and plan for the future. It develops policies, programs, and regulations that help create a sustainable resource advantage, supporting strong, competitive natural resource sectors that are environmentally and socially responsible. And it uses partnerships and international collaboration to help drive progress on natural resource issues important to Canadians.
Strategic Outcomes and Program Activity Architecture
As outlined in its 2011-12 Program Activity Architecture (PAA), NRCan managed its program delivery through three Strategic Outcomes and seven Program Activities designed to achieve expected results, support Government of Canada priorities, and deliver benefits to Canadians.
[Text Version - Program Activity Architecture]
NRCan’s activities also contribute to the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy (FSDS), which has four themes as indicated by the legend below.*
Following the publication of NRCan’s 2011-12 Report on Plans and Priorities14, NRCan’s 2011-12 Program Activity Architecture was revised. Sub-sub-activities that better reflect the scope of its programs were created. This first review led to more substantial changes to its PAA for 2012-13. In addition, key performance indicators (for both the strategic outcome and program activity levels) were updated to better measure and report on results of the NRCan’s programs. Any changes to performance indicators have been identified by a footnote in this report.
* For further details please consult the section on NRCan’s “Contributions to the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy” .
Organizational Priorities
NRCan’s 2011-12 Report on Plans and Priorities15 identified six (6) priorities seen as critical to meeting the Department’s Strategic Outcomes and supporting the Government of Canada’s priorities. Together, these priorities have guided the Department’s policy direction, science and technology initiatives, and program development and delivery. NRCan also successfully delivered on the Government of Canada’s Economic Action Plan16 .
The success in delivering each priority is determined by asses sing achievements against plans and commitments presented in the 2011-12 Report on Plans and Priorities.
Improving the Performance of the Regulatory System for Project Reviews |
Previously Committed Priority |
PAA Linkages: Strategic Outcome 3 |
---|---|---|
Major resource projects are an important driver of long-term economic growth and job creation for Canada. A federal review process for major resource projects that is timely, predictable, transparent and accountable is critical to the resource sectors’ ability to secure investments for resource development, while maintaining strong environmental protection for Canada. All commitments that support this priority have been completed. Key achievements for this priority in 2011-12
|
Enabling Competitive Resource Sectors | Previously Committed Priority |
PAA Linkages: Strategic Outcomes 1, 2 and 3 |
---|---|---|
The current and future competitiveness of Canada’s natural resource sectors is dependent on their ability to access markets, increase investments and develop innovative products and processes. Competitive sectors mean jobs and growth in Canada. All commitments that support this priority have been completed. Commitments related to earth sciences and minerals and metals were also met in 2011-12. These included the signing of collaboration agreements with academia and industry as part of the Targeted Geoscience Initiative 428. (TGI-4) and the completion and publishing of a number of reports and web products, including through the Green Mining Initiative29. Key achievements for this priority in 2011-12
|
* Budget 2012 provided further support for the forest sector under two initiatives: (1) Expanding Market Opportunities Program, which combined the Canada Wood Export and the North American Wood First programs and activities previously delivered under the Leadership for Environmental Advantage in Forestry; and (2) Forest Innovation Program, which combined support for transformative technologies previously delivered through the Promoting Forest Innovation and Investment Program and the Value to Wood Program.
Advancing Clean Energy | Previously Committed Priority |
PAA Linkages: Strategic Outcomes 1 and 2 |
---|---|---|
Energy is a significant segment of the economy and Canada’s leading export. NRCan supports a clean energy transition by delivering programs that encourage the adoption of energy-efficient and renewable and alternative energy products and processes by consumers and industries as well as the development of new clean energy technologies. NRCan’s clean energy programming (ecoENERGY34 programs) was renewed in Budget 2011. Key achievements for this priority in 2011-12
|
Managing Nuclear Issues | Ongoing Priority |
PAA Linkages: Strategic Outcomes 1 and 2 |
---|---|---|
Nuclear energy plays a critical role in Canada’s energy mix. Managing nuclear issues is based on established policy objectives, involving meeting Canada's energy and environmental needs safely, economically and reliably, reducing costs and risks for taxpayers, while maximizing returns on Canada's investments in nuclear, and positioning Canada's nuclear industry to seize domestic and global opportunities. Key achievements for this priority in 2011-12
|
* Budget 2012 provided funding to support the development of new technologies for the production of medical isotopes and to help replace reactor-based isotope supplies.
Advancing Sustainable Resource Development in the North |
Ongoing Priority |
PAA Linkages: Strategic Outcome 1 and 3 |
---|---|---|
The development of Canada’s North will allow Canadians to realize the vast potential of this region, ensuring prosperity and job creation for Northern communities and strengthening Canada’s sovereignty while creating a sustainable resource future for generations of Canadians. Key achievements for this priority in 2011-12
|
Integrated Management | Ongoing Priority |
PAA Linkages: Program Activity 4.1 |
---|---|---|
Timely and cost-effective internal services are critical to support the performance of the overall organization. Key achievements for this priority in 2011-12
|
Risk Analysis
As a large and diverse organization, NRCan prepares for and manages a wide range of risks. The Department’s approach to risk management is outlined in its Integrated Risk Management Policy Framework, which is based on the recognition that a solid understanding of the risk environment is key to achieving its strategic outcomes. High-level strategic/external and operational risks are presented in NRCan’s Corporate Risk Profile, which is monitored and updated regularly. As well, each of NRCan’s sectors has in place a Sector Risk Profile that is updated at least annually.
In 2011-12, the successful management of key operational risks led to strong program performance. For example, the divestiture of AECL’s CANDU Reactor Division helped mitigate important risks for the Government and represented a significant deliverable for NRCan in achieving its outcomes.
The Department also managed a number of risks to ensure that Canada’s natural resource sectors remained competitive. Natural resources are a key economic driver for Canada and play a fundamental role in Canada’s economy. While the global economic outlook remained uncertain in 2011-12, Canada was in a strong fiscal position relative to other G8 countries, due in part to the country’s large and diverse natural resource endowment and its stable investment climate. Canada’s resource endowment and production is far larger than its domestic demand; as a result, economic growth and resource-based prosperity is supported by strong global demand for natural resources.
In 2011-12, NRCan worked to help the natural resource sectors face the uncertain economic outlook abroad (e.g., slower-than-anticipated economic growth in the United States, fragile economic growth in Europe) and to strengthen their resiliency and competitiveness. The Department delivered on the Government’s Economic Action Plan47 (EAP). Specifically, Budget 2011 provided NRCan with new funding authorities:
- Close to $100 million over 2 years for research, development and demonstrations of clean energy and energy efficiency;
- $60 million to support the forest sector’s transformation and to help forest companies innovate and tap into new opportunities abroad;
- $86 million over 2 years for clean energy regulatory actions, with a focus on energy efficiency;
- Up to $400 million for the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes program to help homeowners make their homes more energy-efficient and reduce the burden of high energy costs; and
- Renewed funding for climate change adaptation and international climate change activities, including the Canada-US Clean Energy Dialogue48 in collaboration with Environment Canada.
Natural Resources and Canada’s Economy
- Canada’s natural resources sector – energy, minerals and metals, and forestry accounted for 15% of Canada’s total economic activity in 2011.
- In 2011, the natural resources sector directly employed close to 800,000 Canadians across the country.
- Through the purchase of goods and services, the natural resources sector drives in part the GDP of other sectors (e.g. construction, machinery, professional services). This indirect contribution is estimated at approximately 4% of nominal GDP and about 800,000 jobs in other sectors of the economy in 2011.
While these reaffirm NRCan’s role in delivering on the Government’s agenda, the Department has had to manage risks associated with the diligent and timely implementation of the new and renewed programs funded in 2011. The timing of the launch of some key programs affected, in some cases, the pace at which projects involving partnerships could be implemented. For instance some joint research, development, and demonstration projects were delayed. NRCan managed these program-related risks by monitoring program updates and spending profiles and ensuring that the performance targets for its programs would be met over the longer term lifespan of programs. Quarterly financial and non-financial reviews served to inform senior management of changes and to facilitate re-allocation decisions when warranted.
NRCan continued to manage capacity-related risks. The Department manages several high-profile programs that have a limited lifespan, including large grants and contributions programs. Furthermore, as a science-based department, NRCan manages significant capital assets and highly qualified personnel in an environment where objectives may be achieved on a long time span, but where funding is time-limited and can fluctuate. While this ensures that NRCan’s programs are reviewed on a regular basis and that any new programs are aligned to the Government’s priorities, managing in this context brings about some risks related to workforce and capacity management.
To respond to this, NRCan took several measures to ensure that its resources were allocated where most needed. A full review of corporate risks was completed, and a comprehensive planning process served to align resource to priorities and to establish clear performance targets. A number of workforce and workplace initiatives were also put in place, such as the implementation of a departmental approach to talent management for all employees, including an employee performance management program, and the targeting of recruitment activities towards highly specialized professionals to address immediate capacity gaps.
NRCan took a series of steps to ensure the smooth implementation and deployment of a new financial management system, including the selection of an already-established system through a partnership with Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, based on a strong project management governance regime and extensive training program. The project received the Award of Excellence for Comptrollership in the Public Sector.
Summary of Performance
Departmental Overview
Planned Spending | Total Authorities* | Actual Spending* | |
---|---|---|---|
Program Spending | 1,910.2 | 2,659.1 | 2,129.4 |
Statutory Programs - Atlantic Offshore Accords | 1,613.9 | 1,222.7 | 1,222.7 |
TOTAL | 3,524.0 | 3,881.9 | 3,352.2 |
* Excludes amount deemed appropriated to Shared Services Canada, if applicable.
** Totals in this section may not add up due to rounding.
NRCan's Planned Spending of $3.52 billion was adjusted over the 2011-12 period to $3.88 billion to reflect the increased authorities granted in Budget 2011. This increase included funding for the Clean Energy programs including the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes, Transformative Technologies Program, the Value to Wood Program, the Canada Wood Export Program, the North American Wood First Initiative, and the Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program. The payments to the Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Resource Revenue Fund were lower than forecasted due to changes in the anticipated crude oil prices for 2011-12.
NRCan's Actual Spending of $3.35 billion resulted in a lapse of $529.7 million, primarily due to a lapse in the Grants and Contributions Vote related to ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes and ecoENERGY for Biofuels49 programs. As well, some portions of the Grants and Contributions vote were reprofiled to future years for the Clean Energy Fund50, Sustainable Development Technology Canada’s*Next Generation Biofuels Fund51 and Investments in Forest Industry Transformation Program52 (IFIT). There were also various items reprofiled in the Operating Vote.
Planned | Actual | Difference |
---|---|---|
4389 | 4571 | 182 |
* Sustainable Development Technology Canada (SDTC) is an arm’s length organization created by the Government of Canada to demonstrate new technologies to promote sustainable development, including technologies to address issues related to climate change and the quality of air, water and soil.
Performance by Strategic Outcome
Performance Indicator | Targets | Results |
---|---|---|
Canada's share of resource-based world trade (rank position). | Favourable 5-year trend in rank position based on the Trade Performance Index (TPI). |
Canada’s ranking relative to other countries has improved slightly from the 2006 to 2010 period with respect to wood, wood products and paper (the most recent year for which data are available). With respect to minerals, Canada’s ranking relative to other countries has decreased somewhat. Energy exports grew by 19.7% in 2011 from 2010 to $109.5 billion, or 26.1% of total merchandise trade. Mineral and metal processing industries in Canada grew their exports by 20% between 2010 and 2011, accounting for 23% of merchandise exports. Minerals and metals were Canada’s leading export to China, making up more than a third of exports to that country. The United States remains Canada’s most important trade partner, particularly in energy and forest-related products. China is now Canada’s second most important trading partner. The Trade Performance Index (TPI) is defined and reported by the International Trade Centre (ITC) of UNCTAD/WTO. The ITC recently revised its methodology resulting in changes to previously reported rankings. |
Program Activity |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
2011-12 ($ millions) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes53 | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
1.1 Economic Opportunities for Natural Resources | 2,352.0 | 1,799.3 | 1,799.3 | 1,481.1 | 1,439.5 | Strong Economic Growth |
1.2 Natural resource-based communities* | 12.7 | 0 | 0 | 0.1 | 0.02 | Strong Economic Growth |
Total - Strategic Outcome | 2,364.7 | 1,799.3 | 1,799.3 | 1,481.3 | 1,439.5 |
*There are no activities to present in PA 1.2 as per the 2011-12 Report on Plans and Priorities. All activities under Strategic Outcome 1 were conducted in PA 1.1.
The variance between Planned Spending and Total Authorities is mainly attributable to adjustments of statutory payments under the Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Resource Revenue Fund.
Performance Indicator | Target | Results |
---|---|---|
A*.Change in Canadian greenhouse gas emissions, measured in megatonnes (Mt) of carbon dioxide equivalent. | Canada's national target is a 17% reduction from 2005 levels by 2020. |
[Text Version - Canada's Greenhouse gas emissions] Based on the most recent National Inventory Report 1990-2010: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada54 Canada’s greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions decreased by 6.5% (48 Mt from 2005 to 2010). The largest emissions reductions came from electricity and heat generation, which dropped by 22 Mt, and from manufacturing, which decreased by 17 Mt (driven by the economic downturn), accounting for 35% and 46% of the overall decline, respectively. The decline in emissions from electricity and heat generation is primarily the result of a reduction of electricity and heat generation from coal and oil, as well as improved energy efficiency. Electricity production from renewable sources is increasing, including the contribution from wind, tidal and solar sources. GHG emissions from fossil fuel industries (oil, gas and coal) decreased about 5.5 Mt between 2005 and 2010, primarily due to a 17% decrease in natural gas production and an ongoing trend of declining production of conventional light and heavy crude oil. GHG emissions from the oil sands increased by 16 Mt from 2005 to 2010 due to an increase in production. However, since 1990, the industry has reduced its emissions per barrel of oil produced by 26%. |
B*.Annual harvest of timber relative to the level of harvest deemed to be sustainable (Allowable Annual Cut55 - AAC). | Stay within the upper limit of the supply line (AAC). |
Canada has 397.3 million hectares of forest and other wooded land, representing 40% of the country’s total area56 and 10% of the global forest cover57. It is harvesting timber in a sustainable manner, below the Allowable Annual Cut. Sustainable forest management is a continuous process in which forest management practices and policies evolve in response to scientific advances and public participation. Underpinning sustainable forest management is the objective of meeting society’s need for forest products, while at the same time protecting forest health and the environmental and social values derived from Canada’s forests58. From 1990 until 2010, timber harvests in Canada were between 86% and 48% of the estimated supply of wood deemed sustainable for harvest. Canada’s wood supply has remained relatively stable since 1990 at an average of 242 million cubic metres. The total harvest volume reached a peak of 208 million cubic metres in 2004 and declined to a low of 117 million cubic metres in 2009, the smallest harvest since 1990. The overall decline since 2004 in harvest is the result of economic factors, such as reduced demand for Canadian lumber because of the slowdown in the United States housing market, and reduced global demand for Canadian pulp and paper products. |
* The indicator in the Report on Plans and Priorities was Favourable 5-year trend in petajoules (PJ) saved. This indicator is now used to measure performance at the Program Activity level in accordance with revisions made to NRCan’s Program Activity Architecture and is thus not appropriate to assess performance at the Strategic Outcome level. As such, it has been replaced with Change in Canadian greenhouse gas emissions, an indicator at the Strategic Outcome level.
* The indicator in the Report on Plans and Priorities wasFavourable long-term trend in number of publications.This indicator is a measure of output, which is no longer deemed appropriate for performance at the Strategic Outcome level. As such, it has been replaced with a performance indicator at the Strategic Outcome level.
Program Activity |
2010-11 Actual |
2011–1259 ($ millions) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
2.1 Clean Energy | 1,329.6 | 1,327.3 | 1,327.3 | 1,745.0 | 1,323.3 | A Clean and Healthy Environment |
2.2 Ecosystem Risk Management | 198.3 | 87.0 | 87.0 | 226.7 | 199.1 | A Clean and Healthy Environment |
Total – Strategic Outcome 2 | 1,527.9 | 1,414.3 | 1,414.3 | 1,971.7 | 1,522.4 |
The variance between Planned Spending and Total Authorities is a result of Budget 2011, particularly the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes grant program of up to $400 million, and the Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program. The variance between the Total Authorities and Actual Spending is mainly attributable to a Grants and Contributions Vote lapse related to ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes and ecoENERGY for Biofuels program. A further Grants and Contribution Vote lapse occurred in the Pulp and Paper Green Transformation Program and other ecoENERGY programs, and some funds related to the Clean Energy Fund and the Sustainable Development Technology Canada Next Generation Biofuels Fund were reprofiled into future years. An Operating Vote lapse was largely attributable to the Port Hope Area Initiative and ecoENERGY programs.
Performance Indicators * | Target | Results |
---|---|---|
Contribution to the safety and security of Canadians, and the effectiveness of federal land stewardship and regulatory processes. | Greater than 90% of landmass and natural hazard data meet timeliness and accessibility standards. |
From 2006-07 to 2011-12, NRCan consistently exceeded its 90% target for timeliness and accessibility of landmass and natural hazard system data, as indicators of the quality of its data and knowledge sharing. The provision of this information helps other levels of government, international government bodies, the private sector and professional organizations to prepare for and mitigate natural disasters and make decisions for the effective management of Canada’s natural resources and lands. |
* The indicator in the Report on Plans and Priorities was Favourable long-term trend in number of publications.This indicator is a measure of output, which is no longer deemed appropriate for performance at the Strategic Outcome level. As such, it has been replaced with a performance indicator at the Strategic Outcome level.
Program Activity |
2010-11 Actual Spending |
2011-12 ($ millions) | Alignment to Government of Canada Outcomes | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total Authorities |
Actual Spending |
|||
3.1 Adapting to a Changing Climate and Hazard Risk Management | 60.8 | 63.6 | 63.6 | 55.4 | 50.8 | An Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy |
3.2 Natural Resource and Landmass Knowledge and Systems | 95.5 | 84.4 | 84.4 | 94.2 | 87.2 | An Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy |
3.3 Geomatics Canada Revolving Fund | -0.3 | 0 | 0 | 7.6 | 0.4 | An Innovative and Knowledge-based Economy |
Total – Strategic Outcome 3 | 156.0 | 148.0 | 148.0 | 157.2 | 138.4 |
Internal Services
Program Activity |
2010–11 Actual Spending |
2011-12 ($ millions) | |||
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Main Estimates |
Planned Spending |
Total |
Actual Spending* |
||
4.1 Internal Services | 308.4 | 162.5 | 162.5 | 271.7 | 251.7 |
* Excludes amount deemed appropriated to Shared Services Canada, if applicable.
Contribution to the Federal Sustainable Development Strategy
The Federal Sustainable Development Strategy60 fulfills the requirements of the Federal Sustainable Development Act61, as passed by Parliament in 2008, to make environmental decision-making more transparent and accountable to Parliament. It outlines the Government of Canada’s commitment to improving the transparency of environmental decision-making by articulating its key strategic environmental goals and targets. The FSDS brings together goals, targets, and implementation strategies organized under four themes:
NRCan contributes to progress in all FSDS themes through its program activities as articulated by its Departmental Sustainable Development Strategy62. For details on the contribution of program activities to sustainable development, consult the Program Activity Architecture.
NRCan plays a key role in delivering on the Government’s Clean Air Agenda63 by leading on the Clean Energy component as well as contributing to adaptation and international engagement efforts such as the Canada-United States Clean Energy Dialogue64. In Budget 2011, the Government renewed its commitment to the Clean Air Agenda, as part of Canada’s Economic Action Plan, with a focus on regulatory actions to achieve real emissions reductions while maintaining Canada’s economic advantage.
Addressing Climate Change and Air Quality
NRCan supports the goals of this theme, which are to reduce greenhouse gas emissions and mitigate the impacts of climate change as well as to minimize the threats to air quality so that the air Canadians breathe is clean and supports healthy ecosystems. NRCan contributes to GHG mitigation and air quality through its Clean Energy programs (PAA 2.1), Ecosystem Risk Management (PAA 2.2), Adapting to a Changing Climate and Hazard Risk Management (PAA 3.1), and Economic Opportunities for Natural Resources (PAA 1.1) through forestry and international activities.
Maintaining Water Quality and Availability
NRCan supports the goal to protect and enhance the quality of water so that it is clean, safe and secure for all Canadians and supports healthy ecosystems through activities under Radioactive Waste Management (PAA 2.2.4). NRCan also supports the goal to enhance information to ensure that Canadians can manage and use water resources in a manner consistent with the sustainability of the resource, through Groundwater Geoscience (PAA 2.2.3.2)
Protecting Nature
NRCan supports the goal to maintain productive and resilient ecosystems with the capacity to recover and adapt; and protect areas in ways that leave them unimpaired for present and future generations, through programming in Environmental Geoscience (PAA 2.2.3). NRCan also supports the goal that sustainable production and consumption of biological resources are within ecosystem limits through activities in Forest Ecosystem Science and Application (PAA 2.2.2).
Strategic Environmental Assessments
NRCan also ensures that environmental concerns are considered in its decision-making through Strategic Environmental Assessments (SEAs). During 2011-12, NRCan considered the environmental effects of initiatives subject to the Cabinet Directive on the Environmental Assessment of Policy, Plan and Program Proposals65. Through the strategic environmental assessment process66, 45% of departmental initiatives were found to contribute to the above FSDS Themes, Goals and Targets, with the majority contributing to Themes I and II (the remaining 55% had no impacts or were not applicable to the FSDS).
Further information on the results of detailed strategic environmental assessments is available on the department’s website67. Additional details on NRCan’s activities to support sustainable development and strategic environmental assessments are also available on the department’s website68. For complete information on the FSDS, visit the Environment Canada website69.
Expenditure Profile
The graph below compares the Department’s seven-year spending trend for expenditures and illustrates changes in the department’s overall expenditures for the statutory programs and Canada’s Economic Action Plan initiatives.
Text Version - Spending Trends
NRCan's total actual spending for 2011-12 was $3.35 billion. This included $1.22 billion for the statutory programs for the Atlantic Offshore Accords. Through the Accords, NRCan receives royalties for offshore oil and gas production and subsequently pays an equal amount to the provinces of Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador. As such, statutory payment obligations under the Nova Scotia70 and Newfoundland and Labrador71 Offshore Accord Acts are based primarily on oil and gas royalty revenues received and are affected by the price of oil and gas as well as production levels; therefore, the changes in spending for statutory programs are explained by the fluctuation of oil and gas prices and production levels.
NRCan's spending of $2.13 billion, net of statutory programs, is reflective of changes in funding for its programs and activities. For example, NRCan had higher funding levels in fiscal year 2009-10 and 2010-11 as a result of new funding provided under Canada’s Economic Action Plan. Differences in NRCan’s funding levels over the last three fiscal years are attributable to:
- The delivery of Canada’s Economic Action Plan, with a number of programs that have sunset in 2010-11 or whose funding profile declined from fiscal year 2010-11 to 2011-12. Programs that have sunset or had a decline in funding include ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes, Expanding Market Opportunities, Promoting Forest Innovation and Investment and Modernizing Federal Laboratories. Others have been renewed as part of the Economic Action Plan such as the Clean Energy Fund and Investments in Forest Industry Transformation*.
- In addition, a number of key NRCan programs that were originally part of the Economic Action Plan were renewed in fiscal year 2011-12 as part of the Government’s commitment to clean air and the forest sector. In 2011-12, this included funding of $69.7 million for the ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative72 (ecoEII) and ecoENERGY Efficiency programs; up to $400 million for a one-year extension of the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes program; and $59.4 million for the Forest Innovation and the Expanding Market Opportunities programs.
*Please refer to the end of this section for a list of programs receiving more or less funding from previous years.
NRCan’s projected spending profile indicates a declining trend in expenditures after fiscal year 2011-12 as a result of sunsetting funding for Canada’s Economic Action Plan initiatives as well as other programs, notably the Pulp and Paper Green Transformation Program ($549.8 million), the ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes program ($400 million), the Forest Innovation and the Expanding Market Opportunities Programs ($59.4 million) and the ecoENERGY Technology Initiative73 ($48.7 million).
Information on year-to-year variations for the fiscal year period 2012-13 to 2014-15 can be found in the table below, which provides a list of programs that are sunsetting or will have reduced funding as well as programs that will have increased funding.
Fiscal year |
Programs sunsetting or with reduced funding |
Programs with increased funding |
---|---|---|
2012-13 |
Pulp and Paper Green Transformation Program ecoENERGY Retrofit – Homes Program ecoENERGY Technology Initiative Transfer to Shared Services Canada (SSC) related to the Administrative Services Review ecoENERGY for Biofuels program Isotopes Supply Initiative CANMET Materials Technology Laboratory Relocation Program |
Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program Clean Energy Fund ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative Sustainable Development Technology Canada Next Generation Biofuels Fund ecoENERGY Efficiency Program Port Hope Area Initiative Investments in Forest Industry Transformation Program |
2013-14 |
Clean Energy Fund ecoENERGY for Biofuels program Geo-mapping for Energy and Minerals Program Sustainable Development Technology Canada Next Generation Biofuels Fund Port Hope Area Initiative |
Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program Investments in Forest Industry Transformation Program |
2014-15 |
Clean Energy Fund Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program Port Hope Area Initiative Investments in Forest Industry Transformation Program ecoENERGY for Biofuels Producer Incentive Sustainable Development Technology Canada Next Generation Biofuels Fund |
Estimates by Vote
For information on the department’s organizational votes and/or statutory expenditures, please see the Public Accounts of Canada 2012 (Volume II)74
Voted and Statutory Items ($ millions)
Voted or Statutory Items | Truncated Vote or Statutory Wording |
Actual Spending 2008-09 |
Actual Spending 2009-10 |
Actual Spending 2010-11 |
Main Estimates 2011-12 | Actual Spending 2011-12 |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Vote 1 | Operating Expenditures | 719.2 | 869.7 | 819.6 | 569.9 | 755.4 |
Vote 2 | Capital Expenditures | 8.9 | 21.2 | 13.9 | 21.4 | |
Vote 5 | Grants and Contributions | 382.0 | 780.5 | 1,346.5 | 1,267.5 | 1,285.9 |
Statutory | Minister of Natural Resources – Salary and Motor Car Allowance | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
Statutory | Contributions to Employee Benefit Plans | 58.3 | 67.1 | 66.1 | 58.7 | 64.1 |
Statutory | Canada-Nova Scotia Development Fund | -- | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Statutory | Infrastructure costs relating to the exploration, development, production or transportation of oil and gas in the offshore area of Nova Scotia | 0.6 | 1.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Statutory | Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board | 4.1 | 4.9 | 6.3 | 6.8 | 3.4 |
Statutory | Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board | 2.8 | 2.2 | 2.2 | 3.4 | 2.2 |
Statutory | Payments to the Nova Scotia Offshore Revenue Account | 577.4 | 109.4 | 225.2 | 179.7 | 157.3 |
Statutory | Payments to the Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Resource Revenue Fund | 2,351.0 | 1,180.9 | 1227.7 | 1,424.0 | 1,059.8 |
Statutory | Grant to the Canada Foundation for Sustainable Development | 19.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Statutory | Newfoundland and Labrador Fiscal Equalization Offset Payments | 556.7 | 465.3 | 641.9 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Statutory | Grants in Support of Energy Costs Assistance Measures | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Statutory | Spending of proceeds from the disposal of Crown Assets | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.0 | 0.3 |
Statutory | Refund of amounts credited to revenues in previous years | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Statutory | Grant to the University of Calgary, Institute for Sustainable Energy, Environment, and Economy | 5.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
Statutory | Pursuant to section 2146 of the Jobs and Economic Growth Act, for the divestiture of Atomic Energy of Canada Limited | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 1.7 |
Statutory |
Geomatics Canada Revolving Fund - Operational expenditures - Respendable revenue |
0.9 | 0.5 | (0.3) | 0.0 | 0.4 |
Total Spending | 4,677.5 | 3,491.3 | 4,357.0 | 3,524.0 | 3,352.2 |
Endnotes
28 http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/resources/federal-programs/targeted-geoscience-initiative/10907
38 https://geoscan.nrcan.gc.ca/cgi-bin/starfinder/0?path=geoscan.fl&id=fastlink&pass=&format=FLFULL&search=R=288745
43http://www.nrcan.gc.ca/earth-sciences/about/current-program/geomapping/7131?destination=node%2F7131
59 Ibid note 45.
66 In 2011, the Deputy Minister approved a new internal Directive on Environmental Assessment for NRCan, which updated existing environmental policy on several planes, including providing further specifics on the SEA management process, and referencing the Federal Sustainable Development Act, as well as reporting requirements through the main estimates documents cycle.
Page details
- Date modified: