Summary of the Evaluation of Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) Phase IV Coordination
About TMX Phase IV Coordination
In June 2019, the Government of Canada (GOC) approved the Trans Mountain Expansion (TMX) project. This decision included a commitment to implement eight accommodation measures and responses to 16 recommendations of the Canadian Energy Regulator designed to mitigate or avoid potential effects associated with TMX and to build the capacity of and long-term relationships with Indigenous peoples. The GOC allocated a total of $31.6M to support the federal government’s post-decision (Phase IV) administration of TMX.
While each responsible department remains accountable for the delivery of its own accommodations and recommendations, Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) was allocated $17.5M of this total to lead the whole-of-government coordination across these initiatives. Partner departments - i.e., Fisheries and Oceans Canada (DFO), Canadian Coast Guard (CCG), Transport Canada (TC) and Environment and Climate Change Canada (ECCC) - have also established their own TMX Secretariats to support departmental coordination.
What The Evaluation Found
Planned vs Actual Delivery
We found that the GOC has established suitable governance mechanisms to coordinate the implementation and delivery of the TMX Phase IV activities. While the organizational structure and titles have changed over time to account for evolving roles, NRCan’s two key coordination structures have been mostly operating as planned since 2019. However, the workload related to TMX coordination is not perceived as sustainable and partner departments report having underestimated the level of effort that would be required for coordination and reporting.
Effectiveness of NRCan’s Strategic Policy and Coordination Team (NRCan-SPC)
NRCan-SPC was responsible for supporting oversight and coordination among federal partners, and for tracking progress on implementation of TMX Phase IV. We found that NRCan-SPC has created effective tools and processes to support federal coordination. Key governance bodies are well supported. While partner departments do not always agree on decisions, NRCan-SPC is perceived to be open and transparent in working to resolve cross-cutting issues. NRCan-SPC has also helped facilitate and expedite regulatory approvals. Nevertheless, federal representatives perceived inefficiencies in the processes used to create and update coordination tools and improvements are required to ease the flow of information, including for external communications.
Effectiveness of NRCan’s Phase IV Partnership Office (NRCan-P4PO)
NRCan-P4PO was responsible for facilitating coordination among federal partners and tracking progress on implementation of accommodation measures and other custom commitments to Indigenous groups. We found that NRCan-P4PO has been mostly effective in this coordination role. It has played an innovative role helping partner departments navigate complexity, address more sensitive issues impacting a small number of Indigenous groups, and providing a coordinated federal voice on whole-of-government issues.
NRCan-P4PO also fulfilled its role for initial outreach to the 129 Indigenous groups with specific eligibility to access to some or all TMX Phase IV accommodation measures. However, its engagement strategy was finalized relatively late in the implementation of Phase IV and key communications products (e.g., P4PO newsletter and TMX Indigenous Portal) were either delayed or underused. Related performance metrics and tracking systems do not provide information on the meaningfulness of engagement.
Respondents from (a limited sample of) Indigenous groups generally rated the effectiveness of NRCan-P4PO’s engagement as “poor” to “fair”. Despite a few successful attempts to triage and streamline the GOC’s engagement, NRCan-P4PO has not fully fulfilled its intended role as a “single window” for Indigenous engagement. For various valid reasons, partner departments have continued to develop or maintain their own relationships and are interacting directly with Indigenous groups. Indigenous respondents also perceived room to improve skillsets for engagement (e.g., tailored communications) and reported challenges with building and maintaining relationships, exacerbated by frequent federal staff turnover. As a result, the majority of federal and Indigenous respondents agreed that the federal approach to engagement on TMX has not been effective in reducing engagement fatigue. NRCan-P4PO recognized this issue and has made attempts to respond, but there is room for further improvement.
Facilitating and Impeding Factors
TMX is a high profile, complex and time-sensitive major project for which GOC post-decision activity is unprecedented in scale or scope. Phase IV implementation was also adversely affected by several unforeseen events (e.g., COVID-19 and major natural disasters). While the evaluation found issues in the efficiency of processes and achievement of results, federal coordination on TMX has been reasonably effective in consideration of the broader context of the challenges faced in implementation.
NRCan’s effectiveness was impeded by the federal decision-making and accountability regime for TMX. Specifically, NRCan was given the mandate and accountability for coordination but does not have the authority to direct the actions of partner departments. Regardless, the existence of a coordination function, facilitated by the quality of support from NRCan and senior management, was a factor critical to successes achieved.
Ongoing Need for TMX Phase IV Coordination
The construction of the twinned TMX pipeline is currently expected to be completed in 2023. The evaluation found general agreement on the continued need for GOC coordination, at least as long as TMX Phase IV accommodation measures are still being implemented and/or construction is ongoing.
The coordination function’s location is not perceived to be important provided it continues to ensure the Crown’s commitments made during Phase III consultations and Phase IV are being met. That said, there is strong support for maintaining NRCan-SPC. For senior managers, the key question relates not to continued need for NRCan-SPC but rather the resource levels required to sustain oversight and coordination.
However, the evaluation found that the role of NRCan-P4PO could be reduced now that accommodations are in progress and partner departments have built their own direct relationships with Indigenous groups.
Lessons Learned
The evaluation identified the areas for improvement that could support ongoing delivery of TMX Phase IV (e.g., clearer delineation of roles and responsibilities, increased sustainability of federal workload, improved coordination for Indigenous engagement). The evaluation also identified lessons related to post-decision engagement on major projects, as well as a need to manage the precedent set by TMX and further advance reconciliation with Indigenous peoples. Corporate knowledge built during the implementation of TMX Phase IV should be preserved and related lessons learned from current and past program reviews should be reviewed collectively and shared across the federal government to inform future initiatives.
Recommendation | Management Response and Action Plan |
---|---|
|
Management response: Nòkwewashk concurs with this recommendation, and has already taken steps to streamline products, activities, and processes to reduce the workload burden on TMX Partner Departments. Actions include:
Position responsible: Manager, TMX Implementation Timing: Review of products to take place annually, at the end of each fiscal year to program sunset. Final review expected by April 1, 2025. |
|
Management response: Nòkwewashk concurs with this recommendation, and will work to strengthen and refine communications on TMX Implementation, within the constraints of its significantly reduced capacity. Nòkwewashk will continue to provide coordination support for future communications regarding the TMX initiatives as a whole. TMX Partner Departments are responsible for proactive, two-way communications with Indigenous groups regarding the individual initiatives under their purview. Actions include:
Position responsible: Manager, TMX Implementation Timing: April 1, 2023 |
|
Management response: Nòkwewashk concurs with this recommendation, and building trust and meaningful, and long-term relationships with Indigenous groups is at the core of its mandate. Nòkwewashk is in the process of establishing long-term, place-based mechanisms for developing and strengthening these relationships that are not tied to individual projects or programs. Nòkwewashk will continue to conduct proactive engagement related to TMX through existing mechanisms such as the TMX Indigenous Advisory and Monitoring Committee. However, NRCan has limited resources to carry out its role in coordinating post-decision implementation of TMX and its related initiatives, and will no longer maintain its Phase IV Partnerships Office. Nòkwewashk’s role in carrying out proactive engagement specifically related to the TMX Project and associated initiatives through the Phase IV Partnerships Office has been wound down in favour of broader, place-based, engagement focused on long-term relationship-building. Nòkwewashk will continue to play an important role in being supportive and responsive to Indigenous groups that raise complex or cross-cutting issues related to the TMX Project. Actions include:
Position responsible: ADM Nòkwewashk, NRCan Timing: Actions will be ongoing. Review of progress to date to be completed by April 1, 2025. |
|
Management response: Nòkwewashk concurs with this recommendation, and has adjusted its performance indicators to reflect its role in supporting ongoing Indigenous engagement related to TMX implementation to the extent possible given the dedicated resources available. Actions include:
Position responsible: ADM Nòkwewashk, NRCan Timing: Performance indicators must be fulfilled by program sunset (March 2025). Final reporting expected by June 30, 2025. |
|
Management response: Nòkwewashk concurs with this recommendation, and will work with TMX Partner Departments to ensure there is a mutual understanding of roles and responsibilities. Actions include:
Position responsible: Director General, Regulatory Coordination, Consultation, and Indigenous Economic Inclusion, Nòkwewashk Timing: Annual update of Governance TORs to program sunset (next scheduled for March 2023). Final review expected by April 1, 2025. |
About the Evaluation
The evaluation examined the extent to which TMX Phase IV coordination structures were implemented as planned and could demonstrate progress towards intended results. It also assessed the ongoing relevance of NRCan’s TMX Phase IV coordination and identified lessons learned from early implementation that could be used to improve future performance. The scope of the evaluation focused on NRCan’s lead in coordination from June 2019 to December 2021, with consideration for the role of partner departments in facilitating intended results. The scope excluded the performance of specific accommodations or CER responses linked to TMX and activities that took place during earlier phases of TMX (e.g., Phase III consultations). NRCan’s Evaluation Division collaborated with partner departments to design and complete this evaluation. The evaluation was conducted in accordance with the Treasury Board (TB) Policy on Results (2016) and related Standards on Evaluation.
Page details
- Date modified: