Section II: Analysis of Program(s) by Strategic Outcome
This section provides information on programs that are critical to the realization of NRCan’s strategic outcomes and priorities for 2014-15.
More information about these programs and initiatives, as well as supporting evidence from internal evaluations and audit reports, can be found on NRCan’s websiteFootnote xiii.
Strategic Outcome 1: Canada's Natural Resource Sectors are Globally Competitive
Description
Canada is a major producer and exporter of natural resources. Being competitive in Canadian and foreign markets is imperative to the nation’s economic growth. The objective of this Strategic Outcome is to help Canada’s natural resource sectors become more globally competitive by adapting to the continuously changing conditions of success. This will be achieved by supporting the natural resource sectors to expand and diversify their markets to respond to the high demand from emerging economies, and diversify their product offerings to remain innovative and competitive.
Performance Measurement
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|
| Canada's rank in trade as measured by Canada's Trade Performance Index (TPI) for wood, wood products and paper relative to all nations; units are rank position | Favourable-10 year trend, 2005-2014 |
Canada’s share in the world market for wood, wood products and paper increased by 0.3% to 7.8% in 2012. However, Canada’s ranking relative to other countries decreased between 2007 and 2012 with respect to these products. The economic situation in the United States, which is the number one destination for Canadian wood products and where GDP growth averaged only 2.2% during that period, led to a reduction of wood product exports and explains the relative decline of Canada’s performance. Source: International Trade Centre of United Nations Conference on Trade and Development/World Trade Organization. |
| Canada's rank in trade as measured by Trade Performance Index (TPI) for minerals (includes energy and power) relative to all nations; units are rank position | Favourable-10 year trend, 2005-2014 |
Canada’s share of the world market for minerals, energy and power decreased to 3.6%, from 4.2% between 2009 and 2012. This decline resulted from the emergence of China and other fast-growing Asian countries as natural resource suppliers. Source: International Trade Centre of United Nations Conference on Trade and Development/World Trade Organization. |
Program 1.1: Market Access and Diversification
Description
Canada’s natural resource sectors face two key barriers to market access and diversification: 1) trade and policy barriers and 2) lack of awareness of Canada’s natural resource products. The objectives of this Program are to breakdown those barriers and support natural resource markets by making information available to Canadians, supporting negotiations to reduce trade barriers, and ensuring that regulations are up-to-date. This helps maintain natural resource sectors’ access to existing markets and increases their access to new market segments.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44,912,875 | 44,912,875 | 61,396,582 | 59,733,334 | 14,820,459 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Restructuring, Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Campaign to Build Prosperity for Canada and transfers from the Department of National Defence, as well as the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases. In addition, spending originally planned for program 2.1 Energy-Efficient Practices and Lower-Carbon Energy Sources was re-directed to program 1.1 Market Access and Diversification. Furthermore, costs recoverable from Treasury Board2 and salary pressures have increased actual spending. Offsetting these increases slightly are expenditures that were originally planned for program 1.1 Market Access and Diversification that were subsequently spent in program 1.3 Investment in Natural Resource Sectors. In addition, spending originally planned for program 1.1 Market Access and Diversification was subsequently spent in Internal Services.
2 Costs recoverable from Treasury Board include parental benefits, severance pay, and vacation credits payable upon termination. As authority is provided to the department to make these payments during the year, they are not included in the planned spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 233 | 255 | 22 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
| Natural resource sectors have increased access to existing markets | Natural resource sectors have access to markets as defined by exports of energy products, mineral and metal products and forest products | Favourable 10 year trend by March 31, 2014 | In 2013 (the most recent data available), Canada's share of the US' natural resource imports was 25.6%. Canada's share of global natural resource imports was 4.4%. |
| Natural resource sectors have increased access to new market segments | Dollar value of Canadian Direct Investment Abroad (CDIA) as a measure of investment in and, thus access to foreign markets | Favourable-10 year trend by March 31, 2014 | CDIA has increased by 147% in the natural resources sector, from $73 billion in 2003 to $180.4 billion in 2013. |
| Natural resource sectors have access to new market segments as defined by exports of energy products, mineral and metal products and forest products | Meet or exceed baseline percentage of access to new market segments: 1.44% of China’s natural resource imports, 0.45% share of India’s natural resource imports | In 2013 (the most recent data available), Canada's share of China's natural resource imports was 1.5%. Canada's share of India's natural resource imports was 0.5%. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Increasing market access for Canadian natural resource exports is necessary for maintaining and enhancing Canada’s prosperity. NRCan helped increase market access for Canadian energy, mineral and metal, and forest products through a number of activities, such as increasing awareness among Canadian companies of mineral exploration opportunities, diversifying markets for forest products, reducing regulatory barriers for energy exports and pipelines, and delivering timely regulatory reviews for export licences and pipeline projects. These activities supported performance results at the program level, which show that Canada’s share of the United States’ and global natural resource imports were 25.6% and 4.4%, respectively, while the value of Canadian direct investment abroad increased by 147% between 2003 and 2013, from $73 billion to $180.4 billion.
Sub-Program 1.1.1: Mineral and Metal Markets Access and Development
Description
Canadian mineral and metal producers require access to export markets. Domestic production exceeds domestic demand for many commodities, so tariffs and non-tariff barriers can constrain output. Returns to producers and government revenues can also be reduced by either policies and measures that reduce demand for minerals, metals and products containing metals or certification schemes that discriminate against Canadian producers. This Sub-program administers the Export and Import of Rough Diamonds Act and regulations that implement Canada’s international obligations under the Kimberley Process Certification Scheme and ensure market access for Canadian diamond producers and users.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,719,932
|
473,325
|
(1,246,607) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the expenditures that were originally planned for sub-program 1.1.1 Mineral and Metal Markets Access and Development that were subsequently spent in sub-program 1.3.1 Mineral Investment.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned)
|
|---|---|---|
| 2
|
3
|
1
|
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators
|
Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Businesses have increased opportunities for trade in goods and services to export markets related to minerals and metals |
Mineral and metal exports as a percentage of mineral and metal production value (including coal exports and production from imported feeds) |
Stable or growing by March 31, 2014 |
Mineral and metal exports as a percentage of mineral and metal production value (including coal and excluding aluminum, iron and steel) increased and exceeded the level reached in any of the ten prior years (2003 to 2012). |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
In 2013-14, NRCan’s efforts helped position the minerals and metals sector in Canada to seize export opportunities, particularly to faster-growing markets in Asia. For example, the Department rapidly and securely issued Canadian Kimberley Process export certificates to ensure that only non-conflict diamonds entered the marketplace. In so doing, NRCan has enabled the Canadian diamond industry to reach international markets and reap economic benefits for Canadians. All told, as a percentage of mineral and metal production value (including coal but excluding aluminum, iron and steel), exports increased and exceeded the level reached in any of the ten prior years (2003 to 2012).
NRCan also positioned the minerals and metals sector for future growth opportunities by completing criticality assessments for rare earth elements and four other metals, antimony, cobalt, lithium and tungsten.
Sub-Program 1.1.2: Forest Products Market Access and Development
Description
Canada's forest sector relies heavily on a single market (the United States) for exports of commodity forest products (mainly wood used in residential construction). But in the face of growing global competition, it can no longer rely solely on traditional markets and/or traditional end-uses of products to remain competitive. Canada must develop opportunities for new forest products and end-uses in existing markets, and diversify markets to expand sales. It must also reduce barriers to market access posed by trade restrictions, tariffs, regulations as well as misconceptions of the strong environmental record of Canada's forest sector and its products. Through this Sub-program, Natural Resources Canada provides financial contributions to Canadian forest industry associations to support initiatives aimed at expanding exports to international markets and increasing the use of wood in North American non-residential construction. It also provides financial contributions and science-based information to industry partners to support the development and dissemination of information products aimed at promoting the environmental reputation of Canada's forest sector in international markets. This Sub-program also provides expertise to other federal departments in support of Canada's international negotiating positions on key trade and environmental issues, and analysis that influences policy decisions on key competitiveness opportunities. This Sub-program includes Expanding Market Opportunities Program and International Climate Change and Clean Energy Dialogue.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 24,108,068 | 24,696,628 | 588,560 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to costs recoverable from Treasury Board. In addition, funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases contributed to the variance.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 72 | 81 | 9 |
The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs relates to a shift in priorities
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Forest industry has increased sales of Canadian wood products in international markets |
Diversity of markets for Canadian wood products |
Favourable yearly average relative to Herfindhal Index value of 0.397 in 2011 base year. |
The diversification of Canada's export markets for wood products has increased significantly between 2007 and 2013 as measured by the Herfindahl Index. The index fell to 0.468 in 2013, which means Canada diversified its exports away from a single market. However, with the resurgence of the US economy, the volume and value of Canadian wood product exports to this market have outpaced increases in other markets, resulting in an upward shift on the Index reading which can be perceived as a negative trend against the 2011 Index value. Between 2012 and 2013, the Index reading increased by 1.7%. |
|
Forest industry has increased sales of Canadian wood products in international markets |
Dollar value of wood product sales in targeted offshore markets (China, Korea, Japan and Europe (EU 27)) and other new emerging markets (e.g., India, Middle East) |
10% increase over 2011 base year value of $3.1 billion for targeted offshore markets and $99.3 million for new emerging markets |
In 2013, Canadian wood product exports to offshore markets totalled $3.7 billion, representing an increase of 27.2%, compared to 2012 and 20% above the 2011 value. In 2013, wood product exports to targeted new emerging markets totalled $85.6 million; representing a decline of 0.6% compared to 2012 and a decline of 13.9% compared to 2011. Among the contributing factors for this decline are the depreciation of the Indian Rupee and the slowdown of construction activity in the Middle East in 2012 and the first half of 2013 |
|
Forest industry has increased sales of Canadian wood products in new market segments |
Dollar value of wood products used in non-residential construction projects built with wood as opposed to traditional means (Canada and US) |
10% increase in dollar value relative to base year value in 2011 ($130.3 million) |
In 2013-14, NRCan helped influence 323 projects representing $146.7 million of new wood sales, 12.6% higher than the level achieved in 2011. |
|
Stakeholders in targeted international markets have positive perception of Canadian forest practices and products |
Percentage of targeted stakeholders who have a positive perception of Canadian forest practices and products |
Majority (51%) of targeted stakeholders have positive perceptions |
A third party study conducted in early 2014 revealed that 71% of international stakeholders contacted felt Canada's environmental practices were better than average. As well 75% agreed Canada (and products produced) had a strong forest management reputation |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan has played a role in diversifying markets for Canadian wood products, thereby introducing resilience into the business model of manufacturers. Canadian exports to current offshore markets (China, Japan, Korea and Europe) continued to grow, and in-roads were made in targeted emerging markets (India and the Middle East); meanwhile, Canadian exports to the US increased in the past year as this market rebounds and strengthens.
While external factors—including the depreciation of the Indian Rupee, slowdown in construction in the Middle East, market barriers, and a sluggish American economic recovery—have slowed Canada’s diversification of wood and wood product export destinations, NRCan has worked to help the sector overcome these factors. Specifically, NRCan has conducted market studies to identify niche wood markets (e.g., cabinetry, high-end furniture) where Canadian forest products can meet local demands. This is particularly important in regions such as India and the Middle East where market development is in its nascent stage and a variety of social and economic factors can delay or impede Canada's foothold in these regions.
In 2013-14, NRCan supported Canada’s forest sector by helping to shape North American perception of Canadian wood as an environmentally sustainable and structurally sound choice of building material. Specifically, NRCan helped influence 323 non-residential and mid-rise projects, representing $146.7 million of new wood sales for non-traditional building construction, 12.6% higher than the target level achieved in 2011.
Sub-Program 1.1.3: Energy Market Regulation and Information
Description
Canada realizes many advantages as a result of robust energy markets and strong trade in energy resources. Ensuring these benefits continue to contribute to the broader economy requires regular assessment, analysis and monitoring of Canadian energy resources, including infrastructure and regulations. This Sub-program aims to foster a competitive Canadian energy sector by working with provinces and territories, and internationally, to articulate Canada's approach to the management of energy resources. To achieve this goal, this Sub-program assesses and updates (when necessary) federal energy regulations and policies (e.g. offshore oil and gas, pipelines, nuclear, etc.), engages domestically and internationally on energy issues, and provides Canadians with information on energy markets.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 19,084,875 | 34,563,381 | 15,478,506 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to Atomic Energy of Canada Limited Restructuring, Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Campaign to Build Prosperity for Canada and transfers from the Department of National Defence, as well as the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases. In addition, spending originally planned for sub-program 2.1.2 Support for Clean Energy Decision-making was re-directed to sub-program 1.1.3 Energy Market Regulation and Information. Furthermore, costs recoverable from Treasury Board and salary pressures have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned)
|
|---|---|---|
| 159 | 170 | 11 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results
|
|---|---|---|---|
|
Greater collaboration between federal, provincial, territorial governments on energy issues |
Percentage of priorities, as identified by Energy Ministers completed on time |
100% by end of summer 2014 |
100% complete. During the 2013 Energy and Mines Ministers' Conference, ministers discussed North America’s changing energy landscape and the current challenges and opportunities for Canada, focusing on the major themes of energy supply and its safe, secure and efficient distribution and use. Three energy reports and an infographic were released at this meeting, and an online information resource for stakeholders was launched. |
|
Public and other stakeholders - both domestic and international - have access to information about Canada's energy resource markets and regulations |
Number of website hits and requests for publications |
Maintain level of website traffic and publication requests |
Web tracking indicates that user interest remains high from the previous year, with approximately 35,000 web hits to specific pages from July 1, 2013* to March 31, 2014. *The NRCan website underwent significant upgrades in the last year, and a different traffic monitoring software was implemented. As a result, traffic data were available only as of July 1, 2013. |
|
The Government of Canada's regulatory framework governing Canada’s energy resources (e.g. pipelines, frontier lands and offshore oil and gas) is renewed and continuously improved |
Assessment and/or update to energy regulations and/or Canada's energy regulatory framework |
1, ongoing |
NRCan provided support to several Treasury Board submissions related to energy regulations, worked to strengthen the pipeline safety regime, the national nuclear liability regime and offshore regulatory initiatives. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
In 2013-14, NRCan collaborated with provincial and territorial governments to identify and manage opportunities and risks facing Canada’s energy sector in support of maintaining supply and safe, secure and efficient distribution. The Department also shared information with domestic and international stakeholders about Canada’s energy markets and regulations.
Domestically, NRCan provided policy leadership to put in place world-class safety and security systems to deliver its energy resources to market, including related to the NEB’s work on onshore pipeline regulations and monetary penalties. The Department also played a key role in ensuring that Canada’s pipeline regulatory regime focused on preparedness, prevention, response, liability and compensation. As well, NRCan worked to modernize the regulatory framework governing Canada's frontier and offshore oil and gas sector. NRCan also facilitated predictable and timely regulatory reviews of oil and gas pipeline projects and export licences, as well as the appointment process for pipeline arbitrators and negotiators.
NRCan continued to engage with its energy partners, including through strengthening Canada’s bilateral engagement with the United States. This was accomplished via multiple ministerial trips to Washington and New York, where the Minister emphasized the importance of the Canada-US energy relationship including trade and investment advantages and opportunities. NRCan also supported the Canada-Mexico relationship by sharing information on Canada’s renewed regulatory system and partnership opportunities, particularly in unconventional gas and oil. Beyond North America, NRCan was instrumental in promoting Canada as a responsible resource developer across Europe and in Israel, and it continued to engage multilaterally through bodies such as the International Energy Agency (IEA) and Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation. At the World Energy Congress, NRCan supported Canada’s strengthening of energy cooperation with Japan. NRCan also worked with its Indian counterparts to promote energy trade and investment ties between Canada and India. Furthermore, NRCan addressed market access challenges resulting from the Fuel Quality Directive and California’s Low Carbon Fuel Standard. Finally, NRCan provided energy data and information to support the Minister and NRCan officials in delivering various speeches and responses to letters from citizens and media inquiries.
In collaboration with Public Works and Government Services Canada, Justice Canada and Atomic Energy of Canada Limited (AECL), NRCan launched a process to procure the services of a private-sector contractor to manage and operate AECL’s Nuclear Laboratories under a Government-owned, Contractor-operated model. The procurement process is anchored in the principles of smart procurement, with a view to ensuring fairness, transparency and ongoing industry consultations. The objective of this restructuring is to create value and reduce risks and costs for taxpayers while continuing to fulfill AECL’s core mandate – that is, assume the Government’s waste and decommissioning responsibilities; provide nuclear expertise to support federal responsibilities; and offer services to users of the Laboratories on commercial terms.
NRCan maintains a website on petroleum product prices and a bi-weekly Fuel Focus report. The purpose of the website is to better communicate with the public about the state of the market, the economic drivers influencing prices and alleviate concerns about the level and volatility of petroleum product prices such as gasoline, diesel and furnace oil. NRCan also published frequently asked questions and answers about pipelines and other pipeline facts on its website to provide information on the need for pipelines, pipeline safety and environmental protection, and the regulation of pipelines in Canada, including arbitration and negotiation services.
Program 1.2: Innovation for New Products and Processes
Description
Optimizing the use of Canada's natural resources and the processes by which they are developed would improve the productivity of the natural resources sectors and reduce its dependency on the sale of traditional natural resource products. The objective of this Program is twofold: to maximize the productivity and to decrease our dependency on the sale of traditional products by encouraging natural resources sectors to adopt new technologies and processes to develop new products. This objective is achieved by conducting science, research, development, and demonstrations on new applications, technologies, processes, and products.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 102,524,720 | 102,524,720 | 105,039,435 | 94,093,063 | (8,431,657) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the return of funds from the Investments in Forest Industry Transformation Program to the fiscal framework due to the withdrawal of a large-scale project at the end of the fiscal year. In addition, the Forest Innovation Program had several planned research projects that were not implemented due to a delay in developing a Government of Canada approach in support of the industrial bio refinery capabilities in the Canadian forest sector. As well, spending that was originally planned for program 1.2 Innovation for New Products and Processes was subsequently spent in Internal Services. Slightly offsetting these surpluses are costs recoverable from Treasury Board and expenditures that were originally planned for program 2.3 Responsible Natural Resource Management that were subsequently spent in program 1.2 Innovation for New Products and Processes. In addition, funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases contributed to the variance.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 279 | 303 | 24 |
The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs relates to changes during the year which allocated more FTEs to this program from various other programs, not appearing in the planned FTE amount.
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Natural resource sectors increase production of new products and processes |
Number of new products and processes resulting from NRCan information |
5 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan met its target. For example, a new process to determine sustainable forest biomass removal rates in Canadian forests by looking at biological indicators (biodiversity) was developed as were best practices for establishing forest inventories through the use of lasers (LiDAR). |
|
Research and Development (R&D) expenditures in natural resource sectors as defined by total intramural R&D expenditures in energy, mining and forestry sectors |
Favourable 10-year trend, 2005-2014 |
R&D expenditures in the natural resource sectors experienced a positive upward trend from 2004 to 2006. R&D expenditures remained fairly stable until experiencing a decrease in 2013. Overall, the level of intramural expenditures from business and the federal government in the natural resource sectors increased by around 20% between 2004 and 2013, compared to an increase of approximately 5% for the total economy. | |
|
Public and private sector organizations in the natural resource sectors have increased either cost-efficiency or productivity |
Number of citations of either cost-efficiency or productivity gains in public or private sector organizations |
5 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan met this target. The Canadian Space Agency, for example, uses NRCan data for the safe launching of stratospheric balloons. Private sector strategic analysis companies have also indicated that NRCan’s data extraction tools will greatly facilitate the production of their market analyses. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Innovation plays a key role in supporting the competitiveness of Canada’s natural resource exports. In 2013-14, NRCan undertook targeted efforts at the sub-program level to foster innovation in mining, forestry and geomatics. In particular, the Department provided expertise to industry stakeholders in these areas. Results at the program level indicate that the expertise provided by NRCan was used to develop more than five new products or processes in 2013-14, exceeding the target. NRCan also met the target relating to the number of citations of cost-efficiency and productivity gains in public and private sector organizations. For example, citations were made by Ontario’s Ministry of Natural Resources, Hydro Québec, a partnership between the Canadian Space Agency and France’s Centre National d'Études Spatiales and private sector companies Space Imaging Systems and Transformit Inc.
Sub-Program 1.2.1: Mining Innovation
Description
Increased innovation is needed to improve the productivity and competitiveness of Canadian mines. Canada’s capacity for mining innovation has reached a critical level as a result of declining enrolment in university programs and changes in industry structure. Mining research is fragmented and focused on shorter-term, lower-risk projects to improve existing processes. The time and effort required to develop and commercialize breakthrough technologies and the associated risks are substantially greater. This Sub-program conducts coordinated research to address priorities identified by stakeholders, including the Canada Mining Innovation Council, industry, academics, technology developers and representatives of provincial and territorial governments. A collaborative approach reduces financial risks for industry partners and ensures that program priorities are aligned with business needs. Examples of higher-risk innovation opportunities that could generate substantial economic benefits within Canada include new technologies to develop and operate safely and profitably deeper mines and to process ores, concentrates and recyclable materials that cannot be processed with commercially available technologies. The Sub-program also a) creates opportunities to develop next-generation professionals to spur innovation and b) supplies standard reference materials to service providers and industry analytical laboratories. Laboratories rely on reference materials to ensure the quality of data that inform mineral investment decisions, determine product value, drive process improvement and improve confidence in environmental monitoring.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,526,185 | 4,624,961 | 1,098,776 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to costs recoverable from Treasury Board and expenditures that were originally planned for sub-program 2.3.4 Radioactive Waste Management that were subsequently spent in sub-program 1.2.1 Mining Innovation. In addition, funding related to collective bargaining increases and the operating budget carry forward contributed to the variance.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 36 | 39 | 3 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Academic, government and other non-industry partners increase financial and in-kind contributions for mining and processing research |
Value of financial and in-kind contributions by academic, government and other non-industry partners collaborating with NRCan on mining and processing research |
10% increase over 3-year baseline of $500,000 by March 31, 2015 |
In 2013-14 the value of financial and in-kind contributions was $482,000 and NRCan is on track to meet the target by 2015. |
|
Industry partners increase financial and in-kind contributions for mining and processing research. |
Value of financial and in-kind contributions by industry partners collaborating with NRCan on mining and processing research |
10% increase over 3-year base line of $1.8 million by March 31, 2015 |
In 2013-14 the value of financial and in-kind contributions was $1,557,000 and NRCan is on track to meet the target by 2015. This year task-shared projects, such as one with Vale Canada, to advance waste-activated binder technology, have contributed to NRCan being on track to meet this target. |
|
Technology developers increase demonstration of innovative mining and processing technologies |
Number of demonstration projects |
2 over 5 years, by March 31, 2017 |
NRCan is on track to meet this target. One demonstration project was completed for the monitoring of hoisting cable. A second demonstration project is planned for 2014-15. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
In 2013-14, a number of demonstration projects and technological expansions were supported by NRCan. The Contiscan wire-rope technology, allowing for the use of synthetic ropes instead of conventional steel ropes, was successfully deployed for routine use at Iamgold’s Westwood mine; the technology has been transferred under licence to Meglab for further use. NRCan has continued to conduct research on processes that support the realization of its mineral and metal wealth, including a study on the development of an efficient processing flowsheet for a major Canadian rare earth deposit. The process described in the flowsheet (a key element of pre-feasibility, feasibility and ongoing development of a metallurgical project) is envisaged to require low capital and operating investment yet will allow more than 90 % recovery of rare earth elements and niobium for the particular situation. Its application has been confirmed to be applicable to other deposits with similar geology.
Finally, projects associated with in-situ rock stresses and alternative binders have seen success, although high turnover rates at partners’ operations have slowed progress; nonetheless, such demonstration projects remain on track. Further, other projects, such as work with the Geological Survey of Canada on shale gas seismic applications, are progressing on schedule and will contribute to NRCan’s meeting its target level of industry contributions for mining and processing research.
The Audit Branch at NRCan undertook an audit of the management of the CanmetMINING laboratory and its revenue generation activities in 2013-14. Through the audit process, and follow-up activities, CanmetMINING has developed best practices on the management of science based operations; such activities will support developing continued mining innovations and achieving results for Canada’s metals and minerals sector.
Sub-Program 1.2.2: Forest Sector Innovation
Description
Canada’s forest sector, traditionally the world's largest exporter of forest products, has experienced a decrease in its market share as a result of changing global and regional demand and increasing competition. To regain its competitive position, the sector must focus on innovation (i.e., research, development and deployment) that generates more value from Canada’s forests than it did in the past. This will allow the sector to move away from a traditional volume-based commodity focus towards a more diversified mix of higher-value specialized products, processes and technologies that will be innovative and able to compete profitably in a wider array of markets. To accelerate innovation in the forest sector, an integrated national forest sector innovation system is needed to ensure research priorities are aligned and commonly pursued by partners. Through this Sub-program, Natural Resources Canada provides leadership in Canada’s forest sector innovation system by bringing governments, industry and research institutions together in a working partnership to focus on collectively identifying, funding, and delivering the innovation priorities of the sector. Natural Resources Canada also conducts research and provides financial contributions to FPInnovations, other forest sector research partners, and eligible forest products companies to research, develop, and deploy new products, processes and technologies. This Sub-program includes Investments in Forest Industry Transformation program, Forest Innovation Program, Genomics Research and Development Initiative, Forest Research Institutes, Canadian Regulatory System for Biotechnology and BC Treaties.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 90,440,886 | 77,530,586 | (12,910,300) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to funds returned by the Investments in Forest Industry Transformation Program to the fiscal framework due to the withdrawal of a large-scale project at the end of the fiscal year. In addition, the Forest Innovation Program had several planned research projects that were not implemented due to a delay in developing a Government of Canada approach in support of the industrial bio refinery capabilities in the Canadian forest sector.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 205 | 184 | (21) |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Forest sector innovation is accelerated by the endorsement of an annual research plan by the forest sector innovation system |
Annual research plan endorsed by the FPInnovations National Research Advisory Committee (NRAC) |
1 endorsed research plan by March 31, 2014 |
The target was met through the approval in 2013-14 of the FPInnovations research plan. |
|
NRCan, industry, provinces and academia develop higher value Canadian forest products and processes which lead to new technologies to create a better competitive position for the Canadian forest sector |
Number of new higher-value Canadian forest products or processes that lead to new technologies produced |
10 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan met this target through contributing, with stakeholders in the forest sector, to the development of high value products and processes, including advanced papers, environmentally-sustainable adhesives, technical guides for designing tall wood buildings and methodologies for better understanding forest fibre resources |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Federal funding in support of forest innovation has continued to help Canada's forest sector develop, adapt and commercialize cutting-edge forest products, processes and technologies. To ensure a holistic approach, this funding covers the complete forest sector value chain. Innovations developed based on NRCan’s funding have helped improve the competitiveness of the forest sector, including by broadening the basket of higher-value goods the sector sells into the marketplace; the approval of the FPInnovations research plan will support future innovations contributing to these same outcomes.
While the first iteration of the Investments in Forest Industry Transformation program was slated to sunset on March 31, 2014, Budget 2014 provided $90.4M in additional funding over four years for its continuation, allowing it to support the next wave of forest industry innovation. The funding renewal followed an evaluation of the program that revealed that it was providing needed support for the forest sector and that the innovation culture is just beginning and still needs to be supported. This suggests that IFIT can continue to fund projects of first-of-a-kind technologies, including integrated biorefineries capable of efficiently converting biomass into high-value bioproducts.
Sub-Program 1.2.3: Geomatics Innovation
Description
The emergence of mass-market distribution systems, such as mobile devices, has dramatically increased the demand and profile of location-based data and technology for users such as government and the private sector. However, such Geographic Information Systems (GIS) and other location-enabled applications are dependent on standardized, up-to-date and accurate location-based information. This Sub-program delivers architecture, standardization and application policies and expertise in order to enable the natural resources sectors to create innovative, value-added applications used for example in the management of forests, determining the slope for pipeline location and elevation modelling used in dam construction. The use of NRCan's location-based knowledge in a wide variety of value-added applications can stimulate economic growth and productivity, enabling these sectors to be more competitive.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 8,557,649 | 11,937,516 | 3,379,867 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to changes during the year which allocated more funding to this sub-program from various other sub-programs, not appearing in the planned spending amount. In addition, costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 38 | 80 | 42 |
The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs relates to changes during the year which allocated more FTEs to this sub-program from various other sub-programs, not appearing in the planned FTE amount.
| Expected Results |
Performance Indicators |
Targets |
Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Natural resource sectors adopt national or international geospatial policies, standards or frameworks |
Number of national frameworks adopted, enhancing pan-Canadian interoperability of geo-applications, tools and data |
2 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan released three national geospatial datasets, which have been adopted by provincial and federal organizations: the National Railway Network, the National Road Network, and the National Hydrographic Network. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan continued to demonstrate its geospatial expertise and leadership role within Canada by releasing three national geospatial datasets: the National Railway Network, the National Road Network, and the National Hydrographic Network. These datasets, delivered by NRCan and maintained in partnership with provinces and territories, government agencies, and other stakeholders, will support informed decision-making for policy and economic development in natural resources sectors as well as other sectors of the economy. For example, the new Canada Base Map – Transportation web mapping service has been implemented and is currently used extensively by Passport Canada and Defence Research and Development Canada’s Multi-Agency Situational Awareness System.
NRCan’s open data portal, GeoGratis, continues to be monitored and reported on regularly using a series of web analysis tools to provide a better understanding of the current consumption of our geospatial datasets, information and web services. The Department has produced client profile analysis and reports on web traffic and visitor behaviour for GeoGratis and two other major portals: GeoBase and National Earth Observation Data Framework. Such analytics will continue to inform NRCan on consumer interests and to plan for future data products, information and services.
Finally, NRCan’s phased implementation of the Federal Geospatial Platform (FGP) is on track, with the FGP Secretariat meeting all of its key priorities, including the development of a project charter and implementation plan. These key documents will ensure the FGP supports a high level of interoperability across federal systems, increasing potential for efficiencies and productivity gains. For example, development of the FGP will support Shared Services Canada's data centre consolidation plan, which will result in cost savings and increased physical and cyber security for the Government of Canada.
Program 1.3: Investment in Natural Resource Sectors
Description
Investing in the development of natural resources is costly and risky due to the uncertainties related to the potential economic viability of natural resources. There are many factors to consider when deciding whether or not to develop a natural resource. In some cases, investors and/or companies lack knowledge on and, thus, are unaware of potential opportunities. The objective of this Program is to encourage natural resource sector investment by increasing knowledge of opportunities and thus decreasing the risk of development. This objective is achieved by providing funding and information on the factors that determine the potential economic viability of natural resources.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending
|
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 54,483,815 | 54,483,815 | 65,961,283 | 65,333,593 | 10,849,778 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to Geo-Mapping for Energy and Minerals, a transfer from Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada for the Canada Nunavut GeoScience Office as well as the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases. In addition, costs recoverable from Treasury Board and in-year transfers from program 2.2 Technology Innovation that are not accounted for in the planned spending related to the Program of Energy Research and Development and the ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative have increased actual spending. Furthermore, expenditures that were originally planned for program 1.1 Market Access and Diversification were subsequently spent in program 1.3 Investment in Natural Resource Sectors. Slightly offsetting these increases is spending originally planned for program 1.3 Investment in Natural Resource Sectors being subsequently spent in Internal Services.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 432 | 427 | (5) |
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Natural resource sectors have increased investment |
Growth of capital expenditures in the energy sector (average of past 5 years) compared to growth in overall capital expenditures in Canada (average of past 5 years) |
The average 5 year growth rate of capital expenditures in the energy sector grows at a rate higher than the average 5 year growth rate in capital expenditures in Canada |
The average growth rate for the energy sector is 6.2% compared to the average growth rate for the overall economy, which is 2.7%. |
|
Growth of capital expenditures in the forest sector (average of past 5 years) compared to growth in overall capital expenditures in Canada (average of past 5 years) |
The average 5 year growth rate of capital expenditures in the forest sector grows at a rate higher than the average 5 year growth rate in capital expenditures in Canada |
The average growth rate for the forest sector is ‒ 0.9% which is below the average growth rate of the overall economy, which is 2.7%. However, based on capital expenditure intentions for 2014, the 5-year average could increase to 12.3% for the forest sector next year. |
|
|
Growth of capital expenditures in the minerals and metals sector (average of past 5 years) compared to growth in overall capital expenditures in Canada (average of past 5 years) |
The average 5 year growth rate of capital expenditures in the mineral and metals sector grows at a rate higher than the average 5 year growth rate in capital expenditures in Canada |
The average growth rate for the minerals and metals sector is 8.7% compared to the average growth rate of the overall economy, which is 2.7%. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Investments in the development of Canada’s natural resource sectors are essential for the global competitiveness of exports. NRCan supported investments by helping to address the risks of development while increasing knowledge of potential opportunities. In particular, the Department conducted a number of activities through sub-programs that focused on mineral exploration, forestry and new energy supply. It continued to help improve the regulatory framework for major project reviews through the development and implementation of the Government’s plan for Responsible Resource Development. Results at the program level indicate that over the past 5 years, capital expenditures in the energy, forest and minerals and metals sectors grew at an average of 6.2%, ‒ 0.9% and 8.7%, respectively.
Sub-Program 1.3.1: Mineral Investment
Description
Canada must compete for mineral investment because capital is mobile and flows to countries that offer attractive risk-adjusted returns for investors. Mineral exploration creates opportunities for Canadians and can lead to increasing investments and resource rents over the medium-term. To calibrate policies that affect mineral investment, governments need sector-specific information on mineral exploration and mine development activities. Tracking exploration activities is difficult because there are thousands of exploration companies and projects, with new companies being continually created while others become inactive. This Sub-program addresses this information gap by collecting socioeconomic data on mineral exploration, deposit appraisal and mine complex development expenditures, physical output from production facilities and the value of mineral production and trade. Data is collected under the authority of the Statistics Act, the Resources and Technical Surveys Act and provincial statutes. Results inform policy development, analysis and advice to the Minister and are also used by Statistics Canada, provinces and territories. The program prepares tax rulings for provisions of the Income Tax Act administered by the Minister; provides expertise, analysis and support to other departments with lead responsibility for tax policy, investment policy and promotion and corporate social responsibility; and conducts outreach to global investors.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 9,891,187 | 11,097,999 | 1,206,812 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the expenditures that were originally planned for sub-program 1.1.1 Mineral and Metal Markets Access and Development that were subsequently spent in sub-program 1.3.1 Mineral Investment. In addition, funding related to collective bargaining increases and the operating budget carry forward contributed to the variance. Furthermore, costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 91 | 95 | 4 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Industry decision-makers fund mineral exploration in Canada |
Ranking of planned nonferrous base metals exploration spending in Canada by companies reporting an annual budget of at least US$100,000 |
Third or better in global ranking |
Based on data from SNL Metals and Mining, Canada was the top country destination for budgeted non-ferrous exploration expenditures in 2013. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan has continued to support Canada’s status as the top destination for investment in non-ferrous mineral exploration by developing and disseminating key information products, including publications, information bulletins and maps. These data products are showcased on the NRCan website, distributed at mineral investment and other national and international conferences, and shared with a wide range of stakeholders. They highlight key indicators that are crucial to assess the health of these industries, and identify challenges and opportunities facing different industry segments, such as exploration, and the contributions of these industries to the Canadian economy. While some publications were delayed as a result of new accessibility requirements and resource constraints, the lessons learned will reduce such risks in the future.
NRCan continues to focus on the responsible development of Canada’s resources, including promoting Canada’s approaches in support of Canadian mining companies operating abroad. NRCan supported the Minister's program at the Annual Conference and Trade Show of the Prospectors and Developers Association of Canada (PDAC) to position Canada and Canadian companies as responsible resource developers. It also contributed to Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) by supporting a research initiative to study the evolution of CSR in reporting by Canadian companies under securities regulators; the goal of this initiative is to further enhance implementation of CSR by the Canadian mining industry operating abroad. A review of the Government’s CSR Strategy is being undertaken by Foreign Affairs, Trade and Development Canada in cooperation with NRCan, which will provide advice on refinements to be made to ensure the Strategy remains relevant and effective.
Sub-Program 1.3.2: Forest-based Community Partnerships
Description
Forest sector restructuring has led to mill closures, capacity reductions and job losses in forest-based communities across the country. However, the transitioning forest sector also represents opportunities for communities to participate in a wide-variety of economic development opportunities. Through its Forest Communities Program and the Aboriginal Forestry Initiative, Natural Resources Canada supports and facilitates community and regional-scale partnership projects and provides financial support to 11 forest-based community partnership organizations and to Aboriginal communities across Canada. The objective is to assist community partnership organizations in developing innovative knowledge products, tools and strategies so that Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal forest-based communities may participate in and benefit from emerging economic opportunities. Projects contribute to capacity building and business development opportunities in areas such as biomass and bioenergy; non-timber forest products; local wood initiatives; forest management; value added wood products; and providing services to government and industry.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 4,645,334 | 4,268,233 | (377,101) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to a shift in priorities.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 33 | 23 | (10) |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Forest-based and Aboriginal communities have the knowledge needed to take advantage of emerging economic opportunities |
Number of new economic projects facilitated, brokered, and/or developed with NRCan knowledge and funding |
15 new projects facilitated, brokered, and/or developed with NRCan knowledge and funding by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan met this target, as 18 new projects have been approved. |
|
Increased investments by forest-based community partners relative to investments made by NRCan over the duration of the Forest Communities Program |
Investments from forest community, industry and government partners exceed investments by NRCan in the Forest Communities Program and Aboriginal Forestry Initiative |
Contributions from funded forest community partners exceed NRCan's contribution by 2:1 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan exceeded the target, realizing a contribution rate of at least 3:1 overall, with some projects averaging ratios of 7:1 and 8:1. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Under the Aboriginal Forestry Initiative (AFI), NRCan exceeded its performance target by signing 18 contribution agreements with proponents, some of which were in cooperation with other government departments. The AFI, which allocated more than $2.7 million in G&C funding in 2013-14 yet attracted several times that from community partners, supported projects serving to demonstrate emerging opportunities for Aboriginal entrepreneurs in the forest sector relating to the following: forest management planning, inventories, harvesting, silviculture, reforestation, and forest fuels and fire management to government and industry clients. These projects, while focused on community readiness, will also increase Aboriginal participation and economic development within the natural resource sectors, enhancing business skills and capacity and developing business planning and business management competencies among Aboriginal entrepreneurs and communities. The Forest Communities Program (FCP), which sunset at the end of 2013-14, achieved similar success in attracting high ratios of private to government funding towards similar ends.
Over the years the FCP and NRCan, in partnership with the Canadian Model Forest Network provided support to numerous forest communities and their industries for improving sustainable forest management practices as well as diversifying local economic activities. The Canadian Model Forest Network remains a valued partner for NRCan in the promotion of responsible resource management across the country. NRCan continues to host the International Model Forest Network Secretariat. The Network has grown to include more than 55 Model Forests in 28 countries.
Sub-Program 1.3.3: Targeted Geoscience Initiative 4 (TGI-4
Description
Mineral resources are one of the principal economic drivers in many rural and remote Canadian communities but known reserves are depleting. In order to sustain economic viability in these areas, new geoscience knowledge and techniques are required to help industry more effectively explore for buried, as-yet undiscovered mineral resources in existing and emerging mining areas. The Targeted Geoscience Initiative 4 is the fourth generation of this initiative that develops our understanding of entire mineral systems and provides industry innovative ways for deep exploration, thereby maximizing yield. This initiative targets selected mineral districts across Canada to provide the best examples of Canada's major ore systems and to develop optimal predictive models and techniques for deep exploration. In turn, this program supports the natural resource sector's access to viable investment opportunities.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 11,888,057 | 12,410,082 | 522,025 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the greater contribution of salary expenditures used to support the program as well as costs recoverable from Treasury Board. In addition, funding related to collective bargaining increases and the operating budget carry forward allowed an increase in spending, offset slightly by Budget 2013 Travel Reductions.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 61 | 62 | 1 |
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
By applying NRCan knowledge and/or techniques, industry explores more effectively for as-yet undiscovered resources |
Number of attributions of use of NRCan's geoscience knowledge and techniques in exploration strategies resulting in greater exploration effectiveness |
12 by March 31, 2014 |
A survey concluded that 14 out of 19 surveyed industry clients attributed improvements in exploration strategies and effectiveness to the work of Targeted Geoscience Initiative 4 (TGI-4), with the remaining 5 companies stating that TGI-4 work would be integrated into future exploration initiatives. Independent of the survey, two additional private sector firms attributed NRCan’s work to their exploration effectiveness. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan’s TGI-4 program continues to influence success in mineral exploration across the country, with 16 firms attributing improvements to their exploration strategies to it. These firms operate across the country, in regions such as Ontario’s Ring of Fire, Saskatchewan’s Athabasca Basin, and the Bathurst region of New Brunswick.
In a survey of industry, academic and provincial-territorial stakeholders, 70% of respondents indicated that TGI-4 research was relevant and that their own research networks had been strengthened because of it. Sixty-seven percent indicated that new research opportunities had been created. TGI-4 has led to the training of more than 133 students (60% of which are at the post-graduate level) as Highly Qualified Personnel to fill the widely recognized skill shortage in the mineral exploration industry. The evaluation of TGI-4 in 2014 demonstrated that the Program has produced a wide range of planned outputs using sound, science-based project management techniques and tools.
NRCan continued to develop and improve the TGI-4 program through engaging in a dialogue with industry representatives at two major industry conferences; key industry input collected at these venues served as guidance as NRCan continued to refine the kind of support offered by TGI-4 to close critical knowledge gaps in the mineral exploration sector.
Sub-Program 1.3.4: Geo-Mapping for Energy and Minerals
Description
Without the public availability of reliable geological information, industry risks either investing in development in areas with low potential for energy and mineral resources or using inappropriate strategies to develop these resources. These risks can affect Canada's ability to attract investment; therefore, in order to attract investment, accessible and reliable geological information is required. The Geo-mapping for Energy and Minerals (GEM) activities provide industry with modern geological information, facilitating industry’s ability to identify areas with potential sources of energy and mineral resources. The activities are focused on updating the geological framework, which identifies the potential areas where certain mineral and energy types could be located, and disseminating this knowledge to all involved stakeholders. This fills the critical information gap in the knowledge base needed to increase exploration investment and facilitate land-use decisions in the territories.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 19,103,631 | 26,170,942 | 7,067,311 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to Geo-Mapping for Energy and Minerals, a transfer from Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada for the Canada Nunavut GeoScience Office as well as collective bargaining increases and the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases. In addition, costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 175 | 180 | 5 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Governments and industry have increased geoscience information on Canada's North to help guide development decisions |
Number of different products accessed (e.g., downloaded) annually on Northern geoscience information |
25 by March 31, 2014 |
In 2013-14, there were nearly 28,000 downloads from more than 750 information products of the Geo-Mapping for Energy and Minerals program. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
The Geo-Mapping for Energy and Minerals program was first launched in 2008 as a five-year, $100 million initiative to significantly advance and modernize geological knowledge in the North. The second iteration of this program, GEM-2, was announced by Prime Minister Harper on August 22, 2013, with renewed funding of $100 million over seven years to complete modern, regional scale geological maps and data sets for Canada’s North; GEM-2 exceeded its stated information dissemination targets in 2013-14, and will continue to improve public understanding of resource potential in the North through the regular release of new geological knowledge over the next seven years. Building on the recommendations yielded by an audit of GEM-1, GEM-2 is positioned to provide enhanced knowledge products to optimize investments in the North to benefit Northerners through enhanced economic opportunities and jobs.
Sub-Program 1.3.5: New Energy Supply
Description
The development of new sources of energy is pivotal in addressing Canada's long-term energy requirements due to increased energy use and the global decline in conventional energy resources. These new sources will support the energy supply mix necessary for sustainable long-term economic growth in Canada. However there is a current lack of geoscience information to enable the private sector to make investment decisions. This Sub-program provides strategic assessments, methodologies and information required to make investment decisions on the offshore and other viable renewable resources such as gas hydrates, shale gas, geothermal and tidal energy supplies that could become an important component of Canada’s future energy mix.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 5,166,148 | 6,593,043 | 1,426,895 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to in-year transfers from sub-program 2.2.3 Clean Energy Science and Technology that are not accounted for in the planned spending related to the Program of Energy Research and Development and the ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative. In addition, funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases contributed to the variance. Furthermore, costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 47 | 40 | (7) |
The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs relates to continued efforts to reduce personnel through attrition, as well as redirection to other priorities over the course of the year.
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
The private sector has access to reports such as strategic assessments on offshore and new energy supply to help inform investment decision-making |
Number of different reports, such as strategic assessments, accessed (e.g., downloaded) annually by stakeholders |
5 by March 31, 2014 |
More than 30 New Energy Supply publications were downloaded more than 1,000 times in 2013-14, with several more publications being downloaded more than 250 times. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan’s New Energy Supply sub-program continued to support Canada’s energy sector on long-term investment decisions, as evidenced by the number of strategic assessments and reports provided to firms on the viability of new energy sources. Research results were communicated directly in more than 15 formal presentations to industry. By providing publicly-accessible and leading-edge research through reports, resource assessments and presentations, NRCan influenced and informed decisions by the energy industry. For example, NRCan’s analysis identified a new, potentially significant shale source rock in the Liard Basin in the eastern Canadian Cordillera. Also, two new energy resource assessments were completed on the Utica Shale (Quebec) and Eagle Plain (Yukon) and have been published. Methodologies developed and made available through the sub-program are also presently being applied in conjunction with provincial agencies in studies in three different mature basin settings Duvernay (Alberta), Horn River (British Columbia), and Bakken (Saskatchewan) as well as in the aforementioned, frontier basin, Utica.
Sub-Program 1.3.6: Major Projects Management Office Initiative
Description
Major resource projects represent significant economic investments, creating thousands of jobs and providing important economic development opportunities for communities across Canada. More than $650 Billion is expected to be invested in over 600 major economic projects across Canada over the next 10 years. Efficient and effective federal project reviews are needed to facilitate this investment and capitalize on the potential to stimulate jobs and growth through responsible resource development, while also maintaining strong environmental protection. The objective of the Major Projects Management Office/Initiative is to support timely and effective project reviews and to lead Government-wide efforts to modernize the regulatory system for major projects. This includes efforts to improve the alignment of federal and provincial regulatory processes and to ensure effective and meaningful consultation with Aboriginal people.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned)
|
|---|---|---|
| 3,789,458
|
4,793,294
|
1,003,836
|
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is attributed to the Major Projects Management Office role in supporting the Strategic Projects Secretariat and the Special Federal Representative on West Coast Energy Infrastructure. These two programs had not been included in planned spending at the beginning of the year. In addition, costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 26 | 27 | 1 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Regulatory reviews of major projects are completed in a predictable manner |
Predictable: Percentage of major resource project reviews that meet their Project Agreement milestones |
80%, ongoing |
As of March 31, 2014, 89% of current major resource project reviews were within 8 weeks or less of their target timeline, which represents the collective performance of multiple departments and agencies in meeting their service standards and target timelines for project reviews. |
|
Regulatory reviews of major projects are completed in a timely manner |
Timeliness: Average review time of completed MPMO projects |
Less than 2 years, ongoing |
The average review time of the 15 completed MPMO projects is 1.3 years (67.1 weeks). As of March 31, 2014, the 28 projects that commenced a review under the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act, 2012 are on track to meet target timelines. |
|
System-wide improvement of the federal regulatory process for major project reviews |
Legislative, regulatory and policy improvements advanced through the MPMO Initiative |
Continuous improvement |
As of March 31, 2014, 11 Responsible Resource Development regulations have been published in the Canada Gazette, Part II. With support from its federal partners, NRCan’s MPMO continues to drive ongoing system-wide improvements to the regulatory system for major resource projects in Canada. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan and its federal partners continued to advance fundamental improvements to the regulatory system for major resource projects through implementation of the Government's plan for Responsible Resource Development (RRD), a key component of recent federal budgets. The plan has four key objectives that it is delivering on: making the review process for major projects more predictable and timely; reducing duplication in the review process; strengthening environmental protection; and enhancing consultation with Aboriginal peoples. Since launching RRD, the MPMO and its federal partners have almost fully completed a package of legislative and regulatory reforms, which have improved the conditions for achieving RRD's objectives. The MPMO continues to work on fully implementing these reforms, while driving ongoing system-wide improvements to the regulatory system for major resource projects in Canada.
The work being accomplished by the MPMO is significant in modernizing Canada's regulatory system for major resource projects. The MPMO's activities have enhanced market access and the investment climate for Canada's natural resource sectors while strengthening environmental protection and enhancing Aboriginal engagement and consultation. As of March 2014, the MPMO managed the federal regulatory process for more than 80 projects representing nearly $230 billion in investments to ensure timely and predictable reviews and that new legislated timelines were met. All MPMO projects undergoing a federal regulatory review are on track to have Project Agreements signed by Deputy Heads. The MPMO is also managing whole-of-government coordination on the review process and Crown consultation for complex energy projects, including the Northern Gateway, Trans Mountain Expansion and Energy East Pipeline projects. In addition, the MPMO supported the work of the Special Federal Representative on West Coast Energy Infrastructure, which concluded with a final report that was publicly released in December 2013.
Program 1.4: Statutory Programs – Atlantic Offshore
Description
This Program is about monitoring and facilitating payment disbursal agreements and transfer payments under the Atlantic Offshore Accord Acts.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1,255,167,000 | 1,255,167,000 | 795,884,721 | 795,884,721 | (459,282,279) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributable to lower-than-anticipated payments to the Newfoundland Offshore Petroleum Resource Revenue Fund due to lower than anticipated production levels and crude oil prices; lower-than-anticipated payments to the Nova Scotia Offshore Revenue Account due to reduced royalties from higher than estimated operation costs; and, lower than anticipated Crown Share Adjustment Payments to Nova Scotia.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| - | - | - |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Statutory requirements relating to offshore petroleum payments in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador are managed in a timely manner |
% of offshore payments processed in timely manner |
100%, ongoing |
NRCan anticipated and pro-actively prepared the necessary materials for 100 % of payments to be processed in a timely manner. |
|
Statutory requirements relating to offshore petroleum payments in Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador are managed in an accurate manner |
Percentage of offshore payments processed in an accurate manner |
100%, ongoing |
NRCan anticipated and pro-actively prepared the necessary materials 100% of payments to be processed in an accurate manner. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan ensures the collection of royalties, interests and penalties arising from production in the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador offshore area and the Canada-Nova Scotia offshore area and transfers equivalent sums as well as corporate income taxes and other required payments to the two provincial governments pursuant to the Atlantic Accord Acts.3 NRCan also administers the federal contributions to the operating budgets of the Canada-Newfoundland and Labrador Offshore Petroleum Board and the Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Board. Finally, with its provincial and federal partners, NRCan manages the country’s regulatory system for offshore petroleum exploration and production.
NRCan met its target relating to the timeliness and accuracy of offshore payments in 2013-14. , The Department anticipated and prepared the necessary materials for payments to be processed within a 48-hour period to both Nova Scotia and Newfoundland and Labrador as required under the Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act and the Canada- Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Acts. As a result, 100% of payments were made on time.
3 Canada-Nova Scotia Offshore Petroleum Resources Accord Implementation Act and Canada-Newfoundland Atlantic Accord Implementation Act
Strategic Outcome 2: Natural Resource Sectors and Consumers are Environmentally Responsible
Description
Energy use and natural resource development can have negative impacts on the land, water, and air, which can affect the standard of living of current and future generations. The objective of this Strategic Outcome is to encourage natural resource consumers and sectors to lessen and prevent environmental impacts. Natural Resources Canada (NRCan) contributes to the achievement of this outcome by encouraging the adoption of cleaner and more efficient technologies, products, practices and services, fostering innovative solutions to environmental challenges associated with natural resource development and use, and enabling the management of potential impacts on the environment.
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|
|
Change in Canadian greenhouse gas emissions |
Canada’s national target is a 17% reduction from 2005 levels by 2020 |
Based on Canada’s most recent emissions reporting (National Inventory Report 1990-2012: Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Canada), Canada’s greenhouse gas emissions decreased by 5.1% (37 megatonnes [Mt]) from 2005 to 2012, while the economy grew by 10.6% in the same period. The largest emissions reductions came from the electricity sector, which declined by 35 Mt. Seventy-nine percent of Canada’s electricity comes from non-emitting sources. Source: National Inventory Report. This report is published by Environment Canada each year and submitted to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change. |
|
Annual harvest of timber relative to the level of harvest deemed to be sustainable (Allowable Annual Cut - AAC) |
Stay within the upper limit of the supply line (AAC) |
As per the National Forestry Database57, the annual timber harvest on provincial crown lands that are regulated by the AAC has been below the AAC, which reflects the recognition of sustainable forest management practices. In 2012 (the most recent year for which data are available), the AAC was 195 million cubic metres and the harvest was 130 million cubic metres. Source: The State of Canada’s Forest – Annual Report 2010 (NRCan report – National Forestry Database). |
Program 2.1: Energy-efficient Practices and Lower-carbon Energy Sources
Description
Canada’s energy markets are defined by consumption and production decisions; however, consumers and producers do not necessarily make decisions that minimize their impact on the environment due to several barriers including: 1) a lack of awareness of available options and their benefits, 2) insufficient capacity for adoption (e.g. regulatory frameworks, codes and standards, etc.) and 3) financial risk. The objective of this Program is to address these barriers and encourage and enable energy consumers and producers to adopt cleaner and more efficient technologies, products, services and practices, thereby transforming the market. This objective is achieved through education and outreach activities, targeted incentives, and regulatory interventions that keep pace with technological changes.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 444,317,619 | 444,317,619 | 430,276,325 | 314,652,883 | (129,664,736) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to lapses in the Grants and Contributions vote for ecoENERGY for Biofuels, ecoENERGY for Renewable Power, and Sustainable Development Technology Canada Next Generation Biofuels Fund. Other factors contributing to the variance include reduced legal service costs, unexpected delays in contracting services, and expenditures originally planned for program 2.1 Energy-Efficient Practices and Lower-Carbon Energy sources being re-directed to program 1.1 Market Access and Diversification, program 2.2 Technology Innovation, and Internal Services. Slightly offsetting these reductions are funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases, as well as costs recoverable from Treasury Board which have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 319 | 289 | (30) |
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Energy consumers and producers adopt environmentally responsible products and practices related to energy use and production |
Biofuel production in Canada |
Favourable 5-year trend, as per 2007 baseline of 786.1 million litres of ethanol and 92.8 million litres of biodiesel |
NRCan has met the target, as production of biofuels has increased steadily since the 2007 baseline. Programs managed by NRCan contributed towards achieving production of 1,706 million litres of ethanol and 124 million litres of biodiesel in 2013 |
|
Canada's total annual energy savings due to efficiency (difference between energy use without energy efficiency improvements and energy use with energy efficiency improvements; the units are petajoules (PJ)) |
Favourable 5-year trend in PJ saved, as per 2006 baseline |
From 2007 to 2011, energy savings due to energy efficiency in Canada showed a favorable trend. Over this time period, energy efficiency improvements reduced energy use by 409 PJ. From 1990 to 2011, energy efficiency in Canada improved 23.4%. |
|
|
Renewable electricity generation capacity in megawatts (MW) |
Favourable 5-year trend in MW, as per 2007 baseline of 6,753 MW of installed capacity (excluding large hydro) |
Existing data suggest this favourable 5-year trend is on track as renewable electricity generation capacity increased from 6,753 MW in 2007 to 9,261 MW by 2010. The data source (Statistics Canada) has data currently available up to 2010 only. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan supported the reduction in greenhouse gas emissions by continuing to encourage Canadian consumers and producers to adopt environmentally responsible products and practices. Trends at the program level show that energy efficiency savings have increased over the past two decades. The Department also supported the increase in availability of renewable energy and alternative fuels as well as the provision of clean energy expertise to support decision-making by all levels of governments. Favourable trends in the generation of renewable electricity capacity and the production of biofuels have also contributed to the reduction in emissions. For example, in 2010, total capacity from renewable electricity sources (excluding large hydro) reached 9,261 MW compared to 6,753 MW in 2007. In 2013, Canada’s biofuel production included 1,706 million litres of ethanol and 124 million litres of biodiesel.
Sub-Program 2.1.1: Renewable Energy Deployment
Description
Canada has abundant renewable energy resources and deployment of renewable energy technologies will diversify Canada’s energy mix and in the long-term help to decrease Canada’s GHG emissions. The Sub-program is developing a supportive policy framework for marine renewable energy measures. The Sub-program will also continue to support production from renewable energy projects already deployed. This sub-program is supported by ecoENERGY for Renewable Power, the Wind Power Production Incentive, and Marine Renewable Energy Enabling Measures Programs.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 165,155,760 | 153,339,686 | (11,816,075) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the ecoENERGY for Renewable Power program projects which produced less renewable energy than the maximum allowable under the terms and conditions of their contribution agreements.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 10 | 8 | (2) |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Renewable electricity is produced by the projects supported by NRCan programs |
# of terawatt-hours (TWh) of clean electricity produced |
16.9 TWh by March 31, 2014 |
To date, the projects under the program have achieved 15.7 TWh of production, representing 92% of the project target. |
|
Stakeholders have timely access to information on policy options for developing a regulatory framework for the development of marine renewable energy in the federal offshore |
Policy paper advancing knowledge of policy options for administering marine renewable energy in Canada’s federal offshore is produced on time |
1 policy paper by March 31, 2015 |
This work is on-track. The knowledge gained from analysis of relevant legislation and regulations, informal consultations with other stakeholders and examination of marine renewable energy regulatory regimes from eight countries is being incorporated into a draft paper, which is being prepared as a basis for more formal consultations. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan is on track to achieve its renewable energy targets. The marine renewable policy paper that the Department is developing is on track to be delivered by the March 2015 target; engagements with other government departments and agencies as well as examinations of marine renewable energy regulatory regimes and policies in eight countries have yielded a strong foundation for subsequent, formal consultations.
NRCan’s other efforts to support renewable power under this sub-program in 2013-14 build on the 126 contribution agreements that it signed before March 31, 2011, under the Wind Power Production Incentive and ecoENERGY for Renewable Power programs. These agreements represent 5,382 MW of renewable power capacity and total commitments for the two programs of $1.64 billion. The actual clean energy production was 93% of the project target. Sub-Program 2.1.2: Support for Clean Energy Decision-making.
Sub-Program 2.1.2: Support for Clean Energy Decision-making
Description
The development of Canada's energy resources is a source of greenhouse gas emissions and other environmental impacts. The transition to a cleaner energy mix is a long-term challenge that requires an understanding of how clean energy production options can fit within the broader energy system. There is insufficient information for the public and federal government decision makers to evaluate the effectiveness of solutions to the domestic and international environmental impacts of energy development. This Sub-program provides tools, information and analysis to federal decision-makers and the Canadian public regarding energy-related environmental issues (particularly climate change mitigation) and clean energy technologies, and supports Canada's international climate change negotiators. This Sub-program includes activities under two Clean Air Agenda programs: the Clean Energy Policy Program and the International Negotiations program.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,838,850 | 2,990,862 | (847,988) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to delays in contracting services, reduced legal service costs, and expenditures originally planned for sub-program 2.1.2 Support for Clean Energy Decision making being re-directed to sub-program 1.1.3 Energy Market Regulation and Information and sub-program 2.2.3 Clean Energy Science and Technology.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual
|
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 21
|
23
|
2
|
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Canadian international climate change objectives are advanced in international meetings |
Percentage of Canadian objectives reflected each year in the outcomes of relevant international meetings (e.g. UNFCCC) |
80% by March 31, 2014 |
At least 80% of Canadian objectives were reflected in the outcomes of relevant international meetings, and all outcomes respected the limits and the priorities of Canadian positions |
|
The public and federal government decision-makers have access to information that supports decisions on climate change and clean energy issues |
Number of new or updated information products available to the public that aim to advance knowledge of Canada's energy resources and environmental impacts |
10 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan updated 11 oil sands fact sheets and created 3 new pipeline fact sheets that will be made available to the public. A deck on Shale Gas Development in Canada was also produced and posted on the NRCan website. |
|
Provision of information products (e.g. advice and analysis) to federal decision-makers regarding clean energy and environmental issues in response to requests |
95% of requests fulfilled, by March 31, 2014 |
More than 95% of requests for information and analysis were fulfilled with accuracy and timeliness. In addition to requests, future information needs are anticipated and information and analysis are provided proactively. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
In 2013-14, NRCan worked with federal and international partners toward greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions reductions in the energy sector. For example, NRCan continued its collaboration with Environment Canada (EC) on the sector-by-sector approach to regulating GHG emissions, including the development of regulations applicable to the oil and gas sector. Also in partnership with EC, the Department made progress on air quality regulations, which may have impacts on natural resource sectors.
NRCan continued to provide analysis on Canada's GHG emissions as reported in various publications (such as Canadian submissions to United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and the IEA World Energy Outlook). The information provided was conveyed through print materials related to the oil sands, and shale gas development and as advice and analysis in response to questions on clean energy and environmental issues.
On the international front, NRCan worked through various international fora to advance Canada’s interests relating to clean energy technology, including carbon capture and storage (CCS). For example, the Department led Canada’s participation at the November 2013 Carbon Sequestration Leadership Forum Ministerial Meeting in Washington, D.C., where it showcased Canada’s leadership in advancing CCS, and enhanced overall international collaboration. NRCan also represented Canada on technology issues in negotiations at the UNFCCC, which led to the adoption of decisions aligned with Canada's interests in Warsaw in November 2013. Further, the Department represented Canada in the U.S.-led Clean Energy Ministerial (CEM), showcasing Canada as a leader in clean energy and energy efficiency, and worked collaboratively with other major economies to advance the development and deployment of clean energy technologies. All told, NRCan’s international engagements at key meetings have supported more than 80% of Canadian objectives, with all the outcomes respecting the limits and priorities of Canadian positions.
Sub-Program 2.1.3: Alternative Transportation Fuels
Description
Alternative fuels (e.g., natural gas, ethanol, biodiesel, etc.) have a lower carbon content and thus emit fewer greenhouse gases than conventional transportation fuels such as gasoline and diesel. However, fuel producers and users, vehicle and equipment manufacturers, and policy makers face barriers to the production and use of alternative transportation fuels. These barriers include, but are not limited to: lack of market capacity to produce alternative fuels, lack of familiarity of end-users and other stakeholders regarding the benefits of alternative fuel use and the lack of codes and standards governing alternative vehicles and infrastructure. In order to address these barriers, the Sub-program is responsible for increasing production capacity, designing and developing education and outreach materials and facilitating the design, development and updating of codes and standards. This Sub-program is supported by the ecoENERGY for Biofuels and ecoENERGY for Alternative Fuels programs.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 230,674,216
|
117,332,957
|
(113,341,259)
|
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the Sustainable Development Technology Canada’s Next Generation Biofuels Fund, for which the funding allocated was not required in 2013-14. In addition, the ecoENERGY for Biofuels program had a surplus in the Grants and Contributions vote as a result of uncommitted funds to many projects, unused funds from terminated projects, and proponents producing less and claiming less than the maximum allowable under their contribution agreement.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 27 | 25 | (2) |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Fuel producers have increased capacity to produce renewable alternatives to gasoline and diesel |
Number of litres of renewable alternatives to gasoline and diesel that industry has the capacity to produce |
2 billion litres of domestic productive capacity of renewable alternatives to gasoline and 500 million litres of domestic productive capacity of renewable alternatives to diesel or commensurate with funds available to March 31, 2017 |
NRCan has mostly achieved its target of 2 billion litres by achieving 1.88 billion litres of built production capacity for renewable alternatives to gasoline; in 2013- 14, 1,660 million litres of ethanol were produced and sold by proponents. It also exceeded its alternative to diesel target by achieving 575 million litres of built production capacity for biodiesel. However, actual biodiesel production is below the built capacity because producers continue to be challenged by lack of domestic demand, poor production economics and uncertainty around blending mandates and incentive programs in the US. |
|
Stakeholders (policy makers, end-users, alternative and conventional fuel producers, and vehicle and equipment manufacturers) have increased knowledge of alternative fuel pathways |
Percentage of survey respondents reporting increased knowledge of alternative fuel pathways |
Target to be established once baseline information collected from first survey in 2013 |
NRCan is on track to achieve its target of having 80% of survey respondents reporting increased knowledge of alternative fuel pathways by March, 31, 2016. |
|
Standards community has increased ability to develop and update codes and standards related to alternative transportation fuels |
Number of codes and standards committees actively working on developing and updating the codes and standards |
2 until March 31, 2016 |
NRCan exceeded its target by supporting not only 2 committees working on codes for compressed natural gas vehicles and infrastructure, which resulted in 3 codes being published in 2013/14, but also by supporting a third sub-committee working on a code for liquefied natural gas refuelling and bi-national work on 2 standards for liquefied natural gas components. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
The ecoENERGY for Biofuels program contributed towards the positive trend in production of biofuels in Canada in 2013-14. The program exceeded its target for constructed production capacity for biodiesel (575 ML/year against a target of 500 ML/year); however, market conditions, which are beyond the Department’s control, impacted the delivery against the ethanol target, where constructed production capacity fell short of the target by slightly more than 5% (1881 ML/year against a target of 2000 ML/year).
The ecoENERGY for Alternative Fuels program continued to support technical committees and other stakeholders. For example, in 2013-14, it supported three technical committees, above the target of two, that were developing codes and standards related to natural gas vehicles and infrastructure. NRCan also exceeded its target to support the establishment of two natural gas local support networks, which will act as information hubs for natural gas end-users such as fleets and other key stakeholders; three hubs were established in 2013-14.
Sub-Program 2.1.4: Energy Efficiency
Description
Increasing energy efficiency remains an effective and low-cost means of reducing greenhouse gas emissions. Many Canadian energy users are unaware of the benefits of adopting energy-efficient technologies and practices. As well, because the energy efficiency of housing, buildings, and energy-using products is continually improving, regulations, codes and standards require ongoing stringency improvements. This Sub-program encourages the adoption of energy-efficient technologies and practices through labelling, information and training, and makes the stock of housing, buildings and energy-using products more efficient through regulation, codes, standards and energy benchmarking activities. It also makes industrial and vehicle operations more energy efficient through energy management standards, practices and training. This Sub-program is supported by the ecoENERGY Efficiency program.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 44,648,793 | 40,989,378 | (3,659,415) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to reduced outreach and a change in recipient participation in total project costs, changes in the scope of the class authority under the Housing program, reduced legal service costs, and unexpected delays in contracting IT services. Offsetting these reductions are funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases, as well as costs recoverable from Treasury Board which have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 261 | 233 | (28) |
|
Expected Results |
Performance Indicators |
Targets |
Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Canadians adopt NRCan-targeted energy efficient products and practices |
Number of jurisdictions adopting the 2011 National Energy Code for Buildings (NECB) |
4-6 provinces/territories adopting NECB or equivalent by March 31, 2016 |
4 provinces and territories have adopted the 2011 National Energy Code for Buildings or equivalent: 1 in 2011-12 (Ontario) and 3 in 2013-14 (British Columbia, Nova Scotia and Manitoba). |
|
Number of provincial/territorial/ utility programs using NRCan developed housing standards and systems |
12 regional programs using NRCan developed housing standards and systems to March 21, 2016 |
NRCan has exceeded the target. Across Canada in 2013-14, more than 50 provincial, territorial, municipal, utility and industry programs and regulations were using the home energy rating system and NRCan standards. | |
|
Increased energy efficiency resulting from NRCan programs |
Petajoules of energy saved through energy efficiency programming |
36-44 petajoules by March 31, 2016 |
The ecoENERGY Efficiency program is on track to achieve its target of 36-44 petajoules of energy saved through energy efficient programming by March 31, 2016. In 2013-14, the program achieved more than 22 petajoules of energy savings as a result of energy efficiency programming in the housing, buildings, industry, equipment, and transportation sectors. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan contributed to Canada's long-term goals for the reduction of greenhouse gas emissions while saving Canadian consumers and businesses money. It did this by supporting responsible energy use in Canada through energy efficiency measures, such as training initiatives for individuals and the development of codes and regulations. Accordingly, NRCan met its target in 2013-14 with three more provinces (British Columbia, Manitoba and Nova Scotia) adopting the National Energy Code for Buildings. Furthermore, NRCan’s national housing energy systems and tools have grown to be used in more than 50 provincial, territorial, municipal, utility and industry home energy programs and regulations. For example, these programs and regulations have served to provide consumers with utility incentives and specialty financial products and municipalities with new bylaws.
Through the ecoENERGY Efficiency program, more than 22 petajoules of energy were saved in 2013-14; NRCan is on track to achieve its target energy savings by 2016. This is equivalent to the energy required by more than 215,000 households over one year (excluding transportation requirements). The program exceeded its target of providing training to individuals in the transportation, industry, buildings and housing sectors – collectively training almost 18,000 more individuals than anticipated by March 31, 2014.
Program 2.2: Technology Innovation
Description
Solutions to the environmental challenges faced by the natural resource sectors require sustained efforts in research, development and demonstration because the current level of science and technology is inadequate to address these concerns. However, the natural resource sectors neither have all the necessary knowledge nor make the necessary investments in innovation due to the potential poor return on investment. The objective of this Program is to encourage academia, industry and the public sector to research, develop and demonstrate innovative solutions to environmental challenges encountered in the natural resource sectors. This objective is achieved through the generation and dissemination of scientific knowledge, and the development and demonstration of new technologies.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 265,761,737 | 265,761,737 | 235,868,140 | 155,738,548 | (110,023,189) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the Clean Energy Fund frozen grant and contribution amounts resulting from conditions imposed by Treasury Board that were not met for the Yellowknife, Borealis and Spectra projects. Other factors contributing to the lapse include surpluses in the Clean Energy Fund and Class Grant & Contribution authorities, delays with equipment purchases, and delays with project approval processes for Memorandum of Understanding renewals. In addition, there were in-year transfers to programs 1.3 Investment in Natural Resource Sectors that were not accounted for in the planned spending related to the Program of Energy Research and Development and the ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative and Internal Services. Furthermore, expenditures that were originally planned for program 3.1 Protection for Canadians and Natural Resources were subsequently spent in program 2.2 Technology Innovation. Slightly offsetting these lapses are in-year transfers from program 2.1 Energy-Efficient Practices and Lower-Carbon Energy Sources that are not accounted for in the planned spending, funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases, as well as costs recoverable from Treasury Board.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 622 | 631 | 9 |
The majority of the difference between Planned and Actual Budgetary Financial Resources was related to grant and contribution programs, which do not impact FTEs. The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs is related to some sub-programs having more FTEs than originally planned.
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Stakeholders invest in S&T to address environmental challenges |
Dollar amount of stakeholder investments in S&T to address environmental challenges |
5% increase over 5 years (2005 baseline $934 million) |
NRCan met its target of increasing stakeholders’ investments in S&T to address environmental challenges. For example, third-party support for projects under the Isotope Technology Acceleration Program is helping to develop new isotope technologies that significantly reduce the radioactive waste produced, while work under the Green Mining sub-program has led to the development of plasma torch technologies to break rock without the use of explosives. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Reducing the environmental impacts of natural resource development, including greenhouse gas emissions, requires efforts from all levels of government and the public, as described above. However, industry and other stakeholders also have a significant role to play, as they are well positioned to address environmental challenges on the ground and implement innovative practices. NRCan therefore partners with these groups to fund science and technology to address the environmental challenges facing Canadians and Canada’s natural resource sector.
NRCan’s programs have been able to generate millions of dollars from stakeholders towards research into new materials, demonstration technologies, and innovation in green mining, clean energy and other areas. Through a number of targeted financial assistance programs, NRCan met its goal of having stakeholders contribute 5% more than in the base year. Programs such as the Isotope Technology Acceleration Program, for example, provide financial assistance of up to 65% of the total project cost to fund research. In 2013-14, NRCan funding supported research to develop new isotope production technologies, next-generation nuclear reactors and other technologies to address environmental challenges.
Sub-Program 2.2.1: Materials for Energy
Description
This sub-program directly delivers materials research and solutions that enable cleaner energy production, and more efficient use of energy in end-use applications such as transportation and industry. Canada must reduce greenhouse gas emissions from energy production, transportation and use; grow energy supply; and maintain a mix of energy sources and technologies. Innovative materials solutions are key enablers for new technologies for extraction and processing of oil sands and for nuclear and coal-fired power generation. New materials technologies are also needed to increase oil and gas pipeline capacity and to monitor pipeline performance and integrity. The Sub-program develops advanced materials and processing technologies to reduce vehicle emissions. Key strategies to reduce energy use by conventional, electric and hybrid-electric vehicles are to reduce vehicle weight; increase powertrain efficiency; and improve energy storage, fluid management and other systems. Collaboration with vehicle manufacturers, suppliers and the U.S. Department of Energy drives priorities, accelerates applied research and development and reduces implementation risks for businesses.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 9,189,236 | 16,038,008 | 6,848,772 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the in-year transfers from sub-program 2.2.3 Clean Energy Science and Technology related to the Program of Energy Research and Development and the ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative that are not accounted for in the planned spending. In addition, funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases, as well as costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending. Furthermore, expenditures that were originally planned for sub-program 3.1.2 Materials and Certification for Safety and Security were subsequently spent in sub-program 2.2.1 Materials for Energy.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 79 | 83 | 4 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Industry uses advanced materials technologies in new energy-efficient vehicle designs |
Number of advanced materials technologies to which NRCan contributed that are identified by industry stakeholders for implementation in new energy efficient vehicles to be produced in North America |
2 over 3 years (by March 31, 2015) |
NRCan is on track to meet the target by March 2015. In 2013-14, NRCan delivered one materials technology on the mechanical properties of spot welds to be used on vehicle body structures that are lighter than their steel counterparts. |
|
Industry uses new materials technologies in nuclear reactors |
Number of new materials technologies developed or validated by NRCan in nuclear reactor designs submitted for approval |
3 over 5 years (by March 31, 2017) |
NRCan is on track to meet this target by March 2017. Phase 1 of a project with Atomic Energy of Canada Limited was completed in 2013-14. CanmetMATERIALS has been selected as one of the four promising candidate alloys for Canadian Gen IV SCWR fuel cladding. Also, this year, the development of new metallic coatings to protect steels from corrosion in high-temperature supercritical water has advanced to testing. |
|
Industry uses new materials technology to transport fossil fuels effectively (safely and efficiently) |
Number of proposed projects to transport fossil fuels more effectively (safely and efficiently) using new materials technologies developed or validated by NRCan |
3 over 5 years (by March 31, 2017) |
In 2013-14, NRCan developed two new standards related to pipelines integrity: an improved method of determining the maximum acceptable girth weld flaw size in pipelines; and, assessing compatibility between the plant-applied and field-applied coatings used in pipelines. A third standard has been submitted for review, on whether the toughness of pipe steel is sufficient for crack arrest, thus avoiding long-running fractures. A state-of-the-art full-scale SCC pipe testing facility has been successfully commissioned at the CanmetMATERIALS laboratory furthering NRCan’s research into the SCC resistance of pipelines. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan continued to engage its industrial partners in applied research and development, moving materials innovations further up the technology readiness scale. With staffing and commissioning of major capital investments nearing completion at its CanmetMATERIALS laboratory, NRCan was well positioned to positively impact the competitiveness and environmental performance of industry.
NRCan is on track to meet its targets through developing technologies focusing on energy efficiency in vehicles, clean energy supply and the safe and efficient transport of oil and gas. The end goal of these technological developments is to have materials knowledge deployed in decision-making, design and fabrication processes within industry. The impacts stemming from this work are expected to accrue through higher volume production, cleaner energy sources and safer pipeline.
Sub-Program 2.2.2: Green Mining
Description
Mining and processing has impacts on land, water and air. Technology development and commercialization entail significant financial, market, and technical risk, because uptake is dependent upon regulatory requirements, business investment priorities and availability of funding. This Sub-program reduces business risks by developing and demonstrating innovative mining technologies and practices that eliminate or reduce environmental impacts and risks. Business needs, technology gaps and priorities are identified with input from the Canada Mining Innovation Council and an advisory committee. Applied research aims to a) reduce land disturbance; water, energy and hazardous chemical use; waste volumes; and releases to the environment and b) accelerate site restoration. By responding to business needs and seeking out synergies, the Sub-program focuses development efforts on technologies with the most potential to reduce environmental impacts and risks and to expand domestic and international business opportunities for mining companies, technology developers and consultants. Findings also a) contribute to the scientific, technological and socioeconomic basis for updating federal, provincial and territorial mining and environmental regulations and policies and b) inform policy priorities in other countries that drive demand for technologies and services.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 7,052,371 | 9,232,172 | 2,179,801 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the in-year transfers from sub-program 2.2.3 Clean Energy Science and Technology related to the Program of Energy Research and Development and the ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative that are not accounted for in the planned spending. In addition, spending related to collective bargaining increases and costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 74 | 80 | 6 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Academic, government and other non-industry partners increase financial and in-kind contributions |
Value of financial and in-kind contributions by academic, government and other non-industry partners collaborating with NRCan |
10% increase over 3-year baseline of $1.0 million (by March 31, 2015) |
In 2013-14 the value of financial and in-kind contributions was $1,200,000 and NRCan is on track to meet the target by March 2015. |
|
Industry partners increase financial and in-kind contributions |
Value of financial and in-kind contributions by industry partners collaborating with NRCan |
10% increase over 3-year base line of $3.6 million (by March 31, 2015) |
In 2013-14 the value of financial and in-kind contributions was $3,700,000 and NRCan is on track to meet the target by March 2015. Contributions in 2013-14 from industry include support for plasma torch technology to break rock without explosives and a gap analysis of mining techniques in the north to address environmental challenges. |
|
Technology developers increase demonstration of environmental technologies |
Number of demonstration projects |
2 over 5 years (by March 31, 2017) |
NRCan completed one demonstration project in 2012-13 on Ventilation on Demand and is on track to start a second; it is on track to meet its target. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan continued to work effectively with industry and technology developers to demonstrate environmental technologies, including underground mining projects. Building on its success demonstrating ventilation on demand (VOD) technologies at Vale’s Sudbury operations, NRCan remained on track to demonstrate a second technology, related to land use on mine waste.
NRCan’s partnerships with academia, government and non-industry stakeholders have also continued to result in successes in soliciting financial and in-kind contributions from these groups to fund important mining-related research and technologies. These partnerships, which help inform better R&D, promote innovative new technologies that will reduce energy consumption and the environmental footprint of mining. For example, NRCan supported the development of a protocol to see how metals react in aquatic salt-water environments over time, which will impact environmental research related to marine and aquatic ecosystems. NRCan also continued its work to develop a high-temperature hybrid filtration-based process for the treatment and discharge of water streams generated in in-situ oil sands operations to recover additional bitumen and to produce clean water for reuse. This treatment system offers an effective alternative to the conventional treatment system and will allow for significant energy savings and improved environmental performance.
NRCan recognizes the importance of networking and stakeholder relations to obtain key policy information to guide science in new areas of development. The capacity of building trust with industry allows for ease of operations, such as access to samples, and continuity of project delivery, which is crucial to the success of the overall project development and industry’s adoption of new innovation. To this end, NRCan worked with industry partners to support environmental technologies to address current and future environmental concerns. Recent achievements included the development of plasma torch technology for breaking rock without explosives, and the completion of a gap analysis of mining techniques in the North to address environmental risks and challenges.
An evaluation by internal and external stakeholders was undertaken this year to provide recommendations for improvement of the Green Mining Initiative and NRCan is working towards adjusting its programming based on the recommendations contained therein.
Sub-Program 2.2.3: Clean Energy Science and Technology
Description
Energy production and use has environmental impacts that cannot be adequately addressed using existing technologies. This Sub-program establishes collaborations with academia, industry and the public sector to research, develop and demonstrate innovative solutions for environmental challenges in the energy sector. The objective is for academia, industry, and the public sector to lay the foundation for the next generation of clean energy products and practices that will have fewer negative impacts on Canada's air, land and water, by funding, creating and advancing new energy knowledge and technologies. This Sub-program is supported by the Program of Energy Research and Development, and the Clean Energy Fund, and ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative, and the Isotope Technology Acceleration Program.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 249,520,130 | 130,468,368 | (119,051,762) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the Clean Energy Fund frozen amount in the Grants and Contributions vote resulting from conditions imposed by Treasury Board that were not me for the Yellowknife, Borealis and Spectra projects. Other factors contributing to the lapse include surpluses in the Clean Energy Fund and Class Grant & Contribution authorities, delays with equipment purchases, and delays with project approval processes for Memorandum of Understanding renewals. In addition, there were in-year transfers to sub-programs 1.3.5 New Energy Supply, 2.2.1 Materials for Energy, and 2.2.2 Green Mining that were not accounted for in the planned spending related to the Program of Energy Research and Development and the ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative, slightly offset by transfers from sub-program 2.1.2 Support for Clean Energy Decision-making.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 469 | 469 | - |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Academia, industry and the public sector pursue clean energy S&T that has fewer negative environmental impacts |
Ratio of total NRCan program investments in clean energy S&T versus leveraged funding from partners |
1:1 ratio by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan’s collaborations under this sub-program yielded greater funding from stakeholders than from NRCan. NRCan investments, through the Innovation and Energy Technology Sector for 2013-14 had a ratio of 1:6 or $470 million leveraged from an NRCan investment of $79.8 million, primarily due to significant spending on two Clean Energy Fund large-scale Carbon Capture and Storage demonstration projects. Through its Isotope Technology Acceleration Program, NRCan achieved an average stakeholder investment of 54% over three projects signed in 2013-14. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan continued to make progress in 2013-14 on supporting the research, development and demonstration of clean energy projects, which are instrumental for addressing the environmental impacts that arise from the production of traditional forms of energy. Notably, these initiatives have been funded primarily with industry dollars.
For example, in 2013-14, through the Program of Energy Research and Development, NRCan funded approximately 306 clean energy R&D projects on a range of issues in energy supply, distribution and end use, including five projects to develop measures to address offshore oil spills. In the same fiscal year, through the ecoENERGY Innovation Initiative, NRCan undertook 101 R&D and demonstration projects in five strategic priority areas: energy efficiency, clean energy and renewable fuels, bioenergy, electrification of transportation, and unconventional oil and gas. Additionally, NRCan signed three contribution agreements under the Isotope Technology Acceleration Program to support further development of commercial alternatives to existing reactor-based medical isotope technologies. Consistent with the Government of Canada’s intention to exit the medical isotope business in 2016 and move towards a fully market-based supply chain, the anticipated commercialization of these technologies is expected to improve the security of supply for Canadians, reduce the generation of radioactive waste and support nuclear non-proliferation.
Evaluations of both the Clean Transportation Systems Portfolio and the Built Environment Portfolio were completed and overall were positive. The findings showed that these programs are relevant and that the federal government and NRCan have a legitimate role in these areas of R&D. Areas identified for improvement were related to dissemination of knowledge and transfer of the technology progress gained; NRCan will work towards implementing these improvements.
An evaluation of the Clean Energy Fund was completed as planned in 2013-14.
Program 2.3: Responsible Natural Resource Management
Description
Greater knowledge of risks and environmentally responsible practices could help to prevent and reduce the environmental impacts of past, present and future natural resource development. The objectives of the Program are to enable government departments, regulatory bodies and industry to assess these impacts to the environment; and develop, monitor and maintain resources or clean up wastes responsibly. These objectives are achieved through the provision of assessments and knowledge rooted in sound science, and through waste management efforts in collaboration with provinces, federal agencies and municipalities.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 341,051,255 | 341,051,255 | 330,109,153 | 282,047,031 | (59,004,224) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the Port Hope Area Initiative which experienced delays as a result of a later than anticipated approval date of implementation and due to the need to reflect Public Works and Government Services Canada approval timelines. In addition, expenditures that were originally planned for program 2.3 Responsible Natural Resource Management were subsequently spent in program 1.2 Innovation for New Products and Processes, program 3.2 Landmass Information, and Internal Services. Slightly offsetting these reductions are funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases, as well as costs recoverable from Treasury Board.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 285 | 235 | (50) |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Federal government implements waste management practices that meet modern standards for safety and environmental protection |
Number of contaminated sites where the environmental impacts are reduced |
7 by March 31, 2016 |
NRCan continued to make progress toward meeting its target. Specifically, it worked to reduce environmental impacts at Whiteshell and Chalk River Laboratories, Glace Bay, Port Granby and Welcome waste management facilities, and in Port Hope and Northern Transportation Route sites |
|
Public and private sectors establish practices to mitigate the environmental impacts to natural resources |
Number of public and private sector new/updated policies, regulations or other decision-making tools completed annually |
3 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan met its target in 2013-14 through development of rigorous assessments of the role played by Canada’s forests in climate change mitigation and sharing resources on groundwater geoscience. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
A means of addressing environmental impacts of natural resource development is the provision of science-based information and assessments to all natural resource sectors to support informed decision-making, including those for federal regulatory approval processes. In 2013-14, NRCan developed the first rigorous national biophysical and economic assessment of specific options for how Canada's forests could contribute to climate change mitigation. It also contributed to interdepartmental analysis of how Canada could meet its 2020 greenhouse gas emissions reduction target. NRCan’s publications relating to groundwater resources, the oil sands, shale gas and CCS were also used by stakeholders to improve their own operations. Finally, NRCan's efforts under this program also resulted in continued progress towards a reduction in the number of environmental impacts from contaminated sites (e.g., Whiteshell, Chalk River Labs, Glace Bay, Port Granby and along the Northern Transportation Route).
Sub-Program 2.3.1: Forest Ecosystems Science and Application
Description
Sustainable development of Canada’s forests requires that forest ecosystems and their health are better understood, monitored and assessed as forests are susceptible to climate-induced changes, natural (disease) and man-made influences (harvesting, land-use changes). Decision-making, professional practice, international reputation and market access to forest-related products all rely on sound science and knowledge that enables a better understanding of changing forest dynamics. The objective of this Sub-program is to increase the overall scientific knowledge on forest ecosystems and support knowledge-based sustainable forest management policies and practices that consider sound ecological, social, and economic principles.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 19,009,783 | 19,543,165 | 533,382 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to costs recoverable from Treasury Board. In addition, funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases contributed to this variance.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 152 | 132 | (20) |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Governments, industry, non-governmental organizations and other stakeholders are provided with scientific knowledge on forest ecosystems to support knowledge-based sustainable forest management policies and practices |
Representation of the Canadian Forest Service on advisory boards or committees involving governments, industry, and non-governmental organizations in order to provide scientific knowledge on forest ecosystems |
Maintain current representation on 128 advisory boards or committees, ongoing |
NRCan representatives sat on 123 committees and boards in 2013-14 serving in the capacity of subject matter experts, policy advisors, project coordinators and leaders, and editors of national and international peer-reviewed journals. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Although forest management is a responsibility of the provinces and territories, NRCan helps to reduce the environmental impacts that could result from forest management practices by providing expertise to these stakeholders on how to address challenges related to maintaining the sustainability of forest ecosystems. Through its representation on 123 forest ecosystem advisory boards and committees, NRCan was within 5% of its target of participating on 128 such organizations in 2013-14, since it fluctuates annually
Through the Climate Change Task Group of the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers, NRCan contributed to identifying and developing options to respond to a variety of domestic forest challenges, such as climate change adaptation in the forest sector. Canada’s National Forest Carbon Monitoring, Accounting and Reporting System, for which NRCan continued to develop its carbon budget model, and updated information related to deforestation, enabled improvements to the estimation of forest carbon and estimates of greenhouse gas emissions by the provinces for use in analysis and reporting.
Through the Cumulative Environmental Management Association, NRCan maintained membership and involvement in a number of working groups and task groups and provided advice on the development of practices and guidelines for successful reclamation of landscapes disturbed by oil sands production. NRCan provided a broad range of advice through this group, including technical advice on the design and operation of plot-based monitoring networks in natural and reclaimed areas, and services related to the development and review of work plans of the Association’s forest-related initiatives.
Sub-Program 2.3.2: Groundwater Geoscience
Description
Groundwater provides up to 80% of the rural Canadian population's drinking water and is an essential component of ecosystem health. In the face of growing pressures on water resources due to urbanization, economic expansion and growing energy demands, Canada needs a consistent and coordinated approach to groundwater management. NRCan conducts groundwater mapping and assessment activities on key aquifers to better understand the extent of groundwater systems, their dynamics and vulnerability using common protocols, standards and methods. NRCan also collaborates with its provincial partners to ensure data and approaches in different jurisdictions are harmonized. This information is disseminated through a collaborative, national inventory used by other levels and departments of government, planners and land-use professionals for decision-making. The sub-program’s comprehensive groundwater information resource and expertise contributes to sustainable land-use decision-making and groundwater management activities, which in turn, supports responsible development of Canada’s natural resources.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 3,511,475 | 4,524,619 | 1,013,144 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to costs recoverable from Treasury Board, spending related to collective bargaining increases, and the employee benefit plan.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 28 | 28 | - |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Government and industry have access to groundwater geoscience through a national inventory to support a consistent and coordinated approach to groundwater management |
Number of knowledge citations (e.g., aquifer maps, plans and reports) using NRCan's groundwater maps and assessments |
10 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan exceeded its target of having its groundwater maps, books and assessments cited more than 15 times. In 2013-14, citations were received by municipalities, counties and private sector consultants associated with the mapping and assessment projects that were completed over the years (such as Paskapoo, Spiritwood, Richelieu, and Southern Ontario) or ongoing projects, including Nanaimo. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Department informed sustainable land-use and groundwater management activities, which support the responsible development of natural resources and help with anticipating environmental impacts. Through the Groundwater Geoscience Program, NRCan delivered maps, assessments and characterization activities relating to seven key interjurisdictional aquifers (e.g., Nanaimo, British Columbia, Milk River, Alberta, and Spiritwood, Manitoba). For example, NRCan’s Nanaimo aquifer map and assessment provided the baseline information needed to develop 3D models for groundwater management. These and other products have been cited more than 15 times Canada-wide as having contributed to the advancement of a coordinated and consistent approach to groundwater management. The sub-program also released Canada’s Groundwater Resources, a comprehensive 800+ page book that is a synthesis of knowledge on Canada’s groundwater.
Other key deliverables achieved in 2013-14 were released and shared in a comprehensive and timely manner. These included field characterization studies, geophysical surveys, data analyses, interpretation and production of maps and reports, government reports submitted to provincial partners for revision, publication of three open files and geophysical assets, and five peer-reviewed papers. Many of these deliverables and the expertise contained therein were cited by provincial government departments, including geological surveys in Quebec, Ontario and Alberta, Manitoba Conservation and Water Stewardship, Nanaimo Regional District, and universities. Finally, NRCan ensured longevity of its geoscience information products through incorporating them into the Groundwater Information Network, a national portal.
An evaluation of the Groundwater Geoscience Program (GGP) found that the GGP is relevant, has been quite successful at achieving progress towards its intended outcomes and is well managed. Evaluation recommendations focused on clarifying the program’s mandate with stakeholders, ensuring alignment with their data needs, and developing common minimum data standards. The program is following-through on the recommendations in the evaluation, having already completed one of them.
Sub-Program 2.3.3: Environmental Studies and Assessments
Description
Government departments, regulatory bodies and industry require information rooted in sound science in order to reduce the environmental impacts that may occur in the development of major resource projects. This Sub-program provides innovative scientific information such as remote sensing science and geoscience expertise to address the environmental risks, impacts and constraints imposed by metals mining, northern pipelines, the oilsands and offshore energy development. NRCan’s expertise also contributes toward the completion of environmental assessments required by the Canadian Environmental Assessment Act (CEAA) and for all federally triggered or regulated projects and/or reviews. The expertise is also used in published assessments of non-renewable mineral and energy resources, which are necessary in designating new federal parks and protected areas on federal lands.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 7,616,604 | 7,187,692 | (428,912) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the smaller contribution of salary expenditures used to support the program.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 66 | 45 | (21) |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Governments, regulatory bodies and industry have access to sound environmental geoscience information |
Number of knowledge attributions - e.g., citations - using NRCan's remote sensing data, geoscience data, or derived information, within the context of environmental studies, reports, or guidelines (excluding CEAA Environmental Assessments, and Mineral and Energy Resource Assessments) |
5 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan’s publications from the Environmental Geoscience Program have been used at least five times by governments, regulatory bodies and industry. Groups like Bureau d’audiences publiques sur l’environnement in Quebec for shale gas, Alberta Environment for the oil sands, and SaskPower for carbon capture and storage are examples of agencies using NRCan information. |
|
Percentage of responses, including expert opinion, delivered as per Environmental Assessments (EA) and Mineral and Energy Resource Assessments (MERA) requests for MMS scientific technical expertise |
99% by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan (i.e., one or more sectors) responded with timely technical reviews and advice for 62 projects that were subject to a federal environmental assessment review process. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
The Environmental Geoscience Program (EGP) focuses on characterizing environmental impacts of metals mining, northern energy development, shale gas, northern mineral development, and oil sands development. It was designed to generate new geoscience knowledge to support the development of guidelines and best practices that allow federal regulators and industry to make informed decisions about ecosystem risk management in resource development projects. More than 40 internal and external documents were published by the program in 2013-14. The EGP continued to maximize value in its delivery by leveraging expertise and in-kind resources from other government departments and private sector partners to accomplish research related to shale gas, oils sands and permafrost monitoring projects. Specifically, the program developed projects with early promising results for distinguishing between natural and human-caused environmental contamination from development projects using new and innovative techniques.
The sub-program also delivered geological, seismological, geotechnical, metallurgical, hydrospectral and other scientific advice and technical review for environmental assessments under the CEAA and Northern Environmental Assessment regimes. It released Mineral and Energy resource assessments for Thaidene Nene East Arm of Great Slave Lake, Northwest Territories, and Lancaster Sound National Marine Conservation Area, Nunavut in 2013-14.
As per an evaluation, the Environmental Studies and Assessments sub-program performed well at meeting legislated obligations and objectives of identifying risks of environmental impacts, and informing stakeholders on the validity of environmental impact claims and the resource potential of proposed protected federal lands. NRCan is following up on recommendations focused on ensuring capacity continues to exist to meet future needs in a timely manner, and strengthening program connections to federal and provincial policy, and regulatory groups at the EGP program level.
Sub-Program 2.3.4: Radioactive Waste Management
Description
In the past, radioactive waste management requirements to protect the environment and human health were neither in place, nor as stringent as modern day practices. Thus, historic nuclear or uranium mining activities have, in some cases, resulted in a legacy of radioactive waste or contaminated lands that pose risks to the environment and the health of Canadians. This Sub-program uses policy and program development and implementation to establish long-term management solutions for radioactive waste in areas where federal intervention is required. Specifically, Natural Resources Canada is involved in clean-up operations in cases where either the wastes were produced by a crown corporation, or the original private sector producer either no longer exists or cannot be held responsible. This Sub-program partners with provinces, municipalities and the private sector through the following programs: the Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program; the Historic Waste Program, including the Port Hope Area Initiative; and the Gunnar and Lorado program.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 288,658,393 | 249,010,320 | (39,648,073) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the Port Hope Area Initiative which experienced delays as a result of a later than anticipated approval date of implementation and is due to the need to reflect Public Works and Government Services Canada approval timelines. There were also expenditures that were originally planned for sub-program 2.3.4 Radioactive Waste Management that were subsequently spent in sub-program 1.2.1 Mining Innovation. Offsetting these reductions are funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases, as well as costs recoverable from Treasury Board all of which increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 39 | 18 | (21) |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
The federal government manages (develops and implements) long-term management solutions to clean up radioactive waste |
Percentage compliance with applicable Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission institutional controls/licenses to implement management practices |
100% by March 31, 2022 |
The Department remained fully compliant with CNSC requirements at all sites for which it is responsible. |
|
Percentage of radioactive waste management milestones completed under the Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program |
80% by March 31, 2014 |
The Department was able to exceed the established target of 80% by completing 93% of the radioactive management milestones under the three-year second phase, which ended March 31, 2014. The remaining milestones will be carried forward to 2014-15. | |
|
Percentage of waste management obligations achieved under the Port Hope Legal Agreement for each project |
100% by March 31, 2022 |
The Department continued to meet commitments under the environmental assessments and legal agreements for each of the projects. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
A number of accomplishments were achieved under the Nuclear Legacy Liabilities Program in 2013-14, serving to reduce Canada's overall environmental liability. The Program completed 93% of its milestones for the three-year second phase of the Program. Milestones completed relate to the completion of the Glace Bay Site Restoration and transfer of the land to Enterprise Cape Breton Corporation for reuse and redevelopment, the installation of a permeable reactive barrier to intercept and treat radioactively contaminated groundwater from a historic waste burial area at the Chalk River Laboratories (CRL), addressing a key issue from the CRL site ecological risk assessment, and installing at CRL a 15,000 m2 engineered cover over a large volume of buried, low-level radioactive waste (approximately 100,000 m3) to reduce water infiltration and limit the further spread of groundwater contamination.
In 2013-14, the Port Hope Area Initiative (PHAI) was able to advance construction of the Port Hope Project Waste Water Treatment Plant, bringing the total work completed to 70%, and the Port Granby Project Waste Water Treatment Plant, bringing the total work completed to 90%. Commissioning of the plants should be completed in 2014-15.
Each liability for which NRCan is responsible was managed with the utmost regard for legal, environmental and regulatory considerations; all waste management obligations under the Port Hope Legal Agreement were met, as were all requirements of the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission.
Sub-Program 2.3.5: Earth Observations for Responsible Development of Natural Resources
Description
Efficient and effective regulatory frameworks are the key to ensure responsible development of natural resources. One challenge to such regulatory frameworks is the availability of sufficient environmental information and the associated tools that depict the baseline conditions of valuable environmental components (lands, water and vegetation), the cumulative effect of resource development, and the potential effect of mitigation options. The Earth Observation for responsible development of natural resources sub-program provides satellite Earth observation and geospatial layers that are a fundamental source of information for regulatory frameworks. The sub-programs focus is on the oil sands region as well as other oil/gas concentrated regions in Canada, including the North.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 22,255,000 | 1,781,235 | (20,473,765) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to budget reallocation. Expenditures planned for sub-program 2.3.5 Earth Observation for the Revitalization of Antennas were subsequently spent in sub-program 3.2.1 Essential Geographic Information.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| - | 12 | 12 |
The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs relates to an FTE re-allocation which moved FTEs that were planned for sub-program 3.2.1 Essential Geographic Information to sub-program 2.3.5 Earth Observation.
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Governments, regulatory bodies and industry have access to sound Earth observation scientific information (i.e., value-added datasets and publications) to support responsible resource development |
Number of attributions (i.e., value-added datasets and scientific publications) using NRCan Earth observation scientific information |
5 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan exceeded this target. For example, six conference and workshop papers and presentations were made by the Alberta Energy Regulator citing NRCan Earth observation studies, datasets and associated methods in the Alberta oil sands regions and their potential to improve regulatory monitoring related to responsible energy development. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan strengthened the regulatory framework around resource development, thereby improving Canada’s stewardship of its natural resources, by providing earth observation scientific information to stakeholders. To this end, NRCan’s earth observation scientific information was cited numerous times in 2013-14 by governments, regulatory bodies and industry. Within the federal government, for example, NRCan’s earth observation data enabled Environment Canada to more comprehensively model variations in plant canopies and their influence on natural emissions to assess air quality.
In other jurisdictions, the Department’s expertise enabled the Alberta Energy Regulator (AER) to expand its remote sensing capacity to develop and implement the radar techniques provided by NRCan to improve capability and capacity to ensure responsible resource development. Based on NRCan’s earth observation data, AER began to develop internal capacity to understand and model surface deformation so that informed decisions can be made in the event of bitumen spills in the Cold Lake region. Additionally, NRCan’s earth observation data have enabled stakeholders in Alberta to develop more comprehensive maps for fire management in the oil sands region.
Strategic Outcome 3: Canadians have Information to Manage their Lands and Natural Resources and are Protected from Related Risks
Description
It is through only a deep and expansive understanding of Canada's lands and natural resources so that today’s decision-makers can determine the right choices for tomorrow – choices that keep Canada's lands and natural resources properly managed and safeguarded. This deep and expansive understanding requires expertise and technology. The objective of this strategic outcome is achieved by providing this expertise and technology, enabling a) the management of risks to human, natural resource, and infrastructure health and b) the use of landmass knowledge.
| Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|
|
Number of new and updated public and private sector adaptation and risk mitigation activities, plans and strategies, such as Natural Resource Management Plans, Adaptation Plans or Emergency Preparedness Plans using NRCan information |
5 activities, plans or strategies |
NRCan has met this target by facilitating public and private sector organizations in their development of more than nine adaptation and risk mitigation activities, plans and strategies through information, services and collaboration. Source: Annual Program Performance Reports. |
|
Number of national or international interoperable geo-tools and data frameworks that support the management of lands, natural resources, national infrastructure and human populations |
2 (baseline as of 2012-13) |
NRCan has released new tools and data frameworks, which contribute to the management of Canada's lands and natural resources. Source: Annual Program Performance Reports. |
Program 3.1: Protection for Canadians and Natural Resources
Description
Natural resource development and military activities, and changes in the environment pose risks to human, natural resource and infrastructure health. Without the appropriate coordination for and knowledge on the management of these risks, the impacts would be severe. The objective of this Program is to enable other government departments, communities, and the private sector to manage these risks to human, natural resource, and infrastructure health. This objective is achieved by providing regulation and knowledge, fulfilling legislated responsibilities, and ensuring capacity.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 58,484,119 | 59,202,413 | 66,418,340 | 65,535,095 | 6,332,682 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the receipt of internal transfers in support of the Program of Energy Research and Development as well as the Strategy to Implement a World-Class Prevention Preparedness and Response Regime for Oil Spills from Ships Initiative. In addition, funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to the Canadian Safety and Security Program; the operating budget carry forward, spending related to collective bargaining increases and costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending. Slightly offsetting this increase in spending is a surplus in the Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation program, due to a reprofile of contribution funding from previous years, which resulted in a surplus as the program could not expend the funds on time. In addition, expenditures that were originally planned for program 3.1 Protection for Canadians and Natural Resources were subsequently spent in Internal Services and program 2.2 Technology Innovation, and as a consequence, the vote netted revenue collected in this program exceeded the actual spending due to the majority of expenses being incurred in program 2.2 Technology Innovation and the revenue being collected in program 3.1 Protection for Canadians and Natural Resources.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 456 | 469 | 13 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Other government departments, communities, and the private sector manage risks to natural resources, infrastructure, and human health |
Number of active collaborations with the public and private sector that manage risks to human population, natural resources and infrastructure health |
3 collaboration agreements by March 31, 2014 |
Through its active participation in the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers and associated working groups, NRCan collaborated with provincial and territorial governments to further characterize risks, vulnerabilities and impacts associated with forest disturbances of national significance. NRCan also established two new Adaptation Platform working groups in 2013-14, one on water and climate information, and the other on infrastructure and buildings. |
|
Number of climate change risk or related assessments completed on natural resources and infrastructure |
1 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan completed the writing of the update to the 2008 National Assessment – From Impacts to Adaptation: Canada in a Changing Climate. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
In 2013-14, NRCan focused on a broad range of hazards and risks that could negatively impact Canadians, the environment or infrastructure. To position stakeholders to respond to these risks, proactively and retroactively, NRCan provided expertise related to forest disturbances, adaptation risks and opportunities for communities and northern infrastructure, geohazards and public safety. The Department also supported the regulatory regime for explosives and certifications.
Through its participation in the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers (CCFM) and its associated working groups, NRCan collaborated with provincial and territorial governments to further characterize risks, vulnerabilities and impacts associated with forest disturbances of national significance while identifying opportunities for further integrating cross-country management and adaptation approaches. Specific examples of the work completed include an evaluation of past and current wildland fire trends in Canada to better understand likely future fire conditions under a changing climate along with resource needs and mitigation options, and the publication of a risk assessment of the threat of mountain pine beetle to Canada’s boreal and eastern pine forests.
In addition, two new Adaptation Platform working groups were established in 2013-14—one on water and climate information, and the other on infrastructure and buildings—which will develop and improve access to information and tools to help manage risks from a changing climate. Working group participants include representatives from federal and provincial governments and professional organizations. Also related to climate change, NRCan completed the update to the 2008 National Assessment – Canada in a Changing Climate: Sector Perspectives on Impacts and Adaptation, an update to the 2008 report, From Impacts to Adaptation: Canada in a Changing Climate.
Sub-Program 3.1.1: Explosives Safety and Security
Description
Explosives are essential for many economic activities but are inherently dangerous. Strict controls are needed to protect Canadians from incidents that could result in death, serious injury, and economic and environmental harm. This Sub-program administers and enforces the Explosives Act and regulations that govern the manufacture, importation, transportation, sale, distribution and storage of explosives, including fireworks and pyrotechnics, and the sale of materials that can be used to produce explosives. Explosives use falls primarily within provincial jurisdiction. Activities include compliance promotion, outreach, inspections, investigations and enforcement of the Act and Regulations, testing and development of policies, procedures, guidelines, rules and standards, based on risk. The Sub-program is delivered by headquarters and regional inspectors, supported by a laboratory, and also supplies expertise to other federal government departments and agencies and to other law enforcement agencies.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 5,069,393 | 5,695,103 | 625,710 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to costs recoverable from Treasury Board. In addition, funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases contributed to the variance.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 57 | 58 | 1 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Regulated establishments comply with regulatory requirements to protect Canadians from the dangers of explosives |
Percentage of explosives inspection reports rated satisfactory or better |
70% or more by March 31, 2014 |
767 inspections were conducted with more than 70% of inspection reports in 2013-14 being rated satisfactory or better. |
|
Stricter controls are maintained by distributors on chemicals commonly used to make explosives (precursor chemicals) |
Percentage of regulated precursor chemical distributors that provide documented evidence of the implementation of a voluntary Precursor Outreach Initiative |
75% or more by March 31, 2015 |
NRCan is on track to meet the target as 4500 information sheets have been printed and are in the process of being distributed by regulated precursor chemical distributors. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan continued to fulfill its responsibilities under the Explosives Act in 2013-14, meeting inspection targets and remaining on track to meet information distribution targets. Beyond the regular business of conducting inspections, disseminating information and performing scientific research related to explosives, the Explosives sub-program made significant progress during the year in two areas that will directly impact the safety and security of Canadians. First, NRCan made progress on a national inspection plan to reduce the amount of time inspectors spend travelling versus conducting inspections, which will allow the Department to increase the overall number of inspections. Second, a new set of regulations (the Explosives Regulations, 2013) came into force on February 1, 2014. These new Regulations, the result of many years of work, are clearer and reflect modern industrial explosives practices. The improvements will make it easier for stakeholders to comply with the Regulations, resulting in improved safety for citizens.
Sub-Program 3.1.2: Materials and Certification for Safety and Security
Description
Materials are engineered and fabricated for specific applications and environments. Defects in equipment or structures can cause failures that result in death, serious injury, and economic and environmental damages. Non-destructive testing helps to ensure the integrity of safety-critical components in aircraft, boilers and pressure vessels, bridges, buildings, cranes, heavy equipment, nuclear reactors, pipelines and other applications. Several federal regulators and other authorities require non-destructive testing to be performed by inspectors certified according to national standard CAN/CGSB-48.9712-2006, Qualification and Certification of Non-Destructive Testing Personnel. This Sub-program certifies individuals to this national standard. The standard and certification procedures are aligned with requirements in international standard ISO 9712:2005 and European standard EN 473:2000. The Sub-program also assists other federal government departments and regulatory authorities to develop and implement certification programs and develops materials solutions to provide increased protection to Canadian Forces personnel and assets. The focus is to protect light military vehicles and occupants from the effects of improvised explosive devices, a weapon of choice for insurgents and unconventional forces, and to protect dismounted soldiers and law enforcement personnel against projectiles and fragmentation devices.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,385,150 | (335,689) | (1,720,839) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the expenditures that were originally planned for sub-program 3.1.2 Materials and Certification for Safety and Security but were subsequently spent in sub-program 2.2.1 Materials for Energy, and as a consequence, the vote netted revenue collected in this sub-program exceeded the actual spending due to the majority of expenses being incurred in sub-program 2.2.1 Materials for Energy and the revenue being collected in sub-program 3.1.2 Materials and Certification for Safety and Security.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 8 | 13 | 5 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Defence stakeholders adopt advanced materials solutions to protect light military vehicles and occupants from the effects of improvised explosive devices |
Number of advanced materials solutions to which NRCan contributed that have been identified for adoption by defence stakeholders |
1 over 3 years (by March 31, 2015) |
A prototype composite personal armour material providing better strength and toughness (and therefore protection) has been produced and will go through extensive mechanical property evaluation over the next year. |
|
Individuals are certified to perform non-destructive testing to a national standard |
Number of individuals holding one or more valid certifications issued by NRCan |
4800 by March 31, 2014 |
This target was exceeded as more than 5,400 individuals are currently holding valid certifications. |
|
Number of valid certifications issued by NRCan (certifications are currently offered in six methods and individuals are typically certified in more than one method and/or sector) |
12000 by March 31, 2014 |
This target was exceeded as there are currently more than 13,300 valid non-destructive testing (NDT) certifications and 1461 X-Ray Fluorescent operator (XRF) certifications |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan conducts certification in Non-Destructive Testing (NDT) for industry stakeholders. Achieving certification in NDT ensures that individuals are able to assess, in a consistent manner across the country, the properties of materials without destroying them. As this program is the only source of such NDT-certified personnel for all Canadian industries, and federal regulators such as Transport Canada, the National Energy Board, Health Canada, and the CNSC mandate NDT inspections by certified individuals, NRCan’s programming enables environmental protection and health and safety benefits on a national scale by acting as an enabler for materials testing.
In 2013-14, NRCan met its NDT-related targets by issuing certifications to 5,432 individuals and ensuring that these individuals held a combined total of 13,389 NDT certifications. The NDT program exceeded targets for 2013-14 and also achieved successes communicating with stakeholders. Over the past year, NRCan established a more formal mechanism for engaging and consulting with the numerous stakeholders of the certification program. The long-term objective of this stakeholder communication strategy is to keep building positive participation and to maintain a healthy and robust committee structure to continually address the needs of the industry on a national scope, resulting in an NDT program characterized by greater transparency, dialogue, accountability, and responsiveness.
NRCan also achieved results in supporting the protection of Canadians through collaboration with National Defence and Defence Research and Development Canada (DRDC). Research and development collaborations with DRDC are leading to new armour materials that will provide enhanced protection of military assets and personnel. NRCan continued to use its world-class facilities for this and other materials research, leading to improvements in the fabrication, testing and evaluation of advanced materials for safety and security.
Sub-Program 3.1.3: Forest Disturbances Science and Application
Description
Climate change is widely believed to be contributing to an increase in the frequency and intensity of native and invasive alien forest pest infestations and other disturbances such as wildland fire. Canada needs the scientific knowledge to understand, forecast, mitigate and adapt to natural and human-induced impacts to forest ecosystems. Through this Sub-program, NRCan conducts research and analysis to develop scientific knowledge of forest disturbances (e.g., pests, fire). This scientific knowledge is used by federal, provincial and territorial governments and agencies (both policy-makers and regulators) as well as the forest industry to assess risks, forecast impacts and develop mitigation and adaptation strategies related to pests, fire, and climate change. This Sub-program includes the Invasive Alien Species Strategy for Canada, and Climate Change Adaptation Program.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 25,614,590 | 31,179,664 | 5,565,074 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to costs recoverable from Treasury Board. In addition, the funding related to the operating budget carry forward, spending related to collective bargaining increases, and a change in priorities contributed to this variance.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 263 | 247 | (16) |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Governments, agencies and industry are provided with scientific knowledge on forest disturbances to assess risks, and develop mitigation and adaptation strategies |
Representation of the Canadian Forest Service on advisory boards or committees involving governments, industry, and non-governmental organizations in order to provide scientific knowledge on forest ecosystems |
Maintain current representation on 73 advisory boards or committees, ongoing |
NRCan representatives sat on 77 committees and boards in 2013-14, serving as subject matter experts, policy advisors, project coordinators and leaders, and editors of national and international peer-reviewed journals. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan has expertise conducting research, and then disseminating that research through reports, websites and other fora to support stakeholders in managing risks and developing mitigation and adaptation strategies. In 2013-14, NRCan met its target by having Departmental representatives serve on 77 committees and boards as subject-matter experts, policy advisors, project co-ordinators and leaders, and editors of peer-reviewed journals.
NRCan presented information resources and workshops in 2013-14 on the mitigation of the emerging spruce budworm epidemic in Quebec and eastern Canada and risk analyses for the Canadian Council of Forest Ministers on spruce budworm and the mountain pine beetle. NRCan also led the development and certification of a new biological control product, Rotstop, to combat annosum root disease, a deadly disease caused by an exotic fungus that is threatening pine forests in eastern Canada. Regarding forest fires, NRCan delivered a National Burned Area Composite for historical fires within existing fire management platforms and processes, enhancing Canada’s ability to estimate greenhouse gas emissions.
Sub-Program 3.1.4: Climate Change Adaptation
Description
Climate change poses a risk to Canadian businesses, communities and infrastructure, and collaboration across multi-jurisdictional areas is challenging. This sub-program supports collaboration amongst key regional stakeholders across Canada, including government departments and agencies, private sector and community organizations. These collaborations enable discussion on key adaptation issues and preparation of practical adaptation measures that will prepare for and take advantage of the risks and opportunities resulting from climate change. This sub-program also delivers scientific analysis on key climate change issues affecting Canada's North (North of 60 latitude). Overall, this sub-program helps Canada to better understand, make informed decisions and take practical actions to respond to a changing climate.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 10,914,269 | 9,404,543 | (1,509,726) |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is attributed to the surplus in the Climate Change Impacts and Adaptation program, due to a reprofile of contribution funding from previous years, which resulted in a surplus as the program could not expend the funds on time. Other items affecting the variance include spending related to collective bargaining increases and costs recoverable from Treasury Board.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 34 | 37 | 3 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Governments and communities in the North (North of 60 latitude) are aware of information on adaptation measures |
Number of projects (for design or implementation phases) considering climate change geoscience adaptation measures |
4 by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan’s climate change adaptation information was considered in design and implementation phases of projects managed by a wide variety of northern stakeholders, including twenty from federal, territorial, regional, and local governments and associations, two from the construction industry, two from geotechnical consultants, four from academia, and one from an international organization |
|
Key stakeholders across Canada consider climate change/adaptation issues in their decision-making |
Percentage change in number of public or private sector decision-makers considering climate change in their planning |
30% total increase over 2009-10 baseline of 13 decision makers, by March 31, 2015 |
The survey to document the change in this indicator is on track for delivery in 2014-15. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
The research, expertise and guidance products offered by NRCan on climate change adaptation will help those with responsibilities for adaptation better plan and undertake actions, reducing risks and ultimately costs. In 2013-14, a wide variety of northern stakeholders used NRCan’s information, including twenty from federal, territorial, regional, and local governments and associations, two from the construction industry, two from geotechnical consultants, four from academia, and one from an international organization. For example, the Government of Northwest Territories and geotechnical consultants adopted scientific and technological developments for use in transportation route selection, the Government of Nunavut incorporated NRCan group displacement maps and geophysics results into the decision-making and planning of their $300 million Iqaluit airport improvements, and more than 400 individuals and associations accessed coastal erosion and ice breakup brochures.
The National Climate Change Adaptation Platform itself grew to more than 200 members and 11 Working Groups whose projects delivered 43 new products in 2013-14. These included the review of 35 mining-related policies and programs in four provinces which identified barriers and enablers for adaptation actions in the mining sector and three case studies of adaptation actions in the mining sector. The Platform also hosted 4 webinars to facilitate the information exchange on topics such as a US utility's response to Hurricane Sandy. Through the Platform, NRCan invested $3.85 million which—when added to the more than $4 million from the public and private sectors—initiated 36 new cost-shared projects to help Canadians adapt to a changing climate.
NRCan developed partnerships with Aboriginal Affairs and Northern Development Canada-Beaufort Regional Environmental Assessment (BREA) and the Canada-Nunavut Geoscience Office, as recommended in a 2012 program evaluation.
Sub-Program 3.1.5: Geohazards and Public Safety
Description
To ensure that Canadians are protected from natural hazards constant monitoring and effective planning for adverse natural events are required. Such events include earthquakes, volcanic eruptions, landslides, geomagnetic storms, radiological and nuclear incidents, and tsunamis. The provision of hazard information and products helps other levels of government, including international government bodies, the private sector and professional organizations such as the Canadian Institute of Planners to prepare for and mitigate natural disasters. This work also meets NRCan’s obligation for ongoing nuclear test monitoring, as is required under the Comprehensive Nuclear Test Ban Treaty. This sub-program comprises of a research component that disseminates risk-related information to support the response, recovery and preparedness phases of emergency management.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 16,219,011 | 19,591,474 | 3,372,463 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the receipt of internal transfers in support of the Program of Energy Research and Development as well as the Strategy to Implement a World-Class Prevention Preparedness and Response Regime for Oil Spills from Ships Initiative. In addition, funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to the Canadian Safety and Security Program, spending related to collective bargaining increases; the operating budget carry forward, and costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 93 | 114 | 21 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Other levels of government, private sector and professional organizations involved in emergency management in Canada rely on information from NRCan's hazard information services and hazard mitigation knowledge products for decision-making |
Annual number of other levels of government, private sector or professional organizations involved in emergency management in Canada confirming level of use of NRCan information in decision-making |
5 by March 31, 2014 |
Eight key stakeholders involved in emergency management (EM), including provincial departments and municipalities, utilized sub-program outputs to enhance their decision-making. For example, the provincial EM organizations of Manitoba, New Brunswick, and Quebec have been utilizing NRCan-developed tools and methodologies to evaluate flood risk and mitigation options within their jurisdictions. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
In 2013-14, NRCan’s Earthquakes website served 301,000 requests and seismologists located 60 significant and/or felt earthquakes in Canada and posted information to web and social media. This sub-Program also delivered 4 new national-scale seismic hazard maps which have been recommended for adoption into 2015 National Building Codes.
NRCan’s leadership in the provision of emergency management information was used by eight key stakeholders to improve their decision-making. For example, the successful adoption by Hydro One of a Geomagnetically Induced Current (GIC) simulator highlighted the need for comprehensive understanding of the specifications and uniqueness of electrical distribution systems. This learning has been recognized and NRCan’s experts worked in partnership with Manitoba Hydro toward strengthening the electrical distribution system in that jurisdiction. Meanwhile, NRCan supported the provincial emergency management organizations of Manitoba, New Brunswick and Quebec in using tools and methodologies to evaluate flood risks and mitigation options.
NRCan also built on its strong foundation of working with federal government partners, by strengthening collaboration and partnership with Public Safety Canada and by helping develop a National Disaster Mitigation Program, amongst others.
A 2013 evaluation of this sub-program indicated that NRCan was delivering federally mandated, valuable, relevant, quality products for emergency managers across the full spectrum of the emergency management cycle and in a manner that leveraged resources and the engagement of key emergency management clients and stakeholders. The recommendations identified in the evaluation are being reviewed and implemented.
Program 3.2: Landmass Information
Description
NRCan provides clearly-defined legal boundaries, a robust property system framework, authoritative geographic infrastructure and fundamental geospatial information on Canada’s landmass, without which Canada's economy, environment, and standard of living would be negatively impacted. This program delivers Canada's regulatory system for Canada Lands legal surveys, the fundamental geodetic reference system, earth observation and mapping information. Together, these support the Canadian public, other departments and levels of government, the private sector and academia to carry out a variety of decisions founded on location-based information, such as land transactions, commercial/industrial development, transportation and logistics. This fundamental information enables, effective management of Canada’s natural resources and lands including opportunities for collaboration across jurisdictions (i.e. cross-border planning, regulatory efficiency), which advances the interests of Canada’s natural resources sectors, both domestically and internationally.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 44,500,738 | 44,500,738 | 83,852,111 | 73,828,231 | 29,327,493 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to budget reallocation. Expenditures planned for program 2.3 Responsible Natural Resource Management for the Revitalization of Antennas were subsequently spent in program 3.2 Landmass Information. In addition, funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, transfers from the Department of National Defence for the Polar Continental Shelf Program – Canadian Armed Forces Arctic Training Centre project; spending related to collective bargaining increases; the operating budget carry forward and costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending. Slightly offsetting these increases is some funding originally planned for program 3.2 Landmass Information being subsequently spent in Internal Services.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 461 | 394 | (67) |
The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs relates to an FTE re-allocation which moved FTEs that were planned for program 3.2 Landmass Information to various other programs, such as 2.3 Responsible Natural Resource Management, as well as several unplanned staffing departures and ongoing staffing processes that have not been completed.
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Public, private sectors and academia use accurate, Government of Canada geo-information for decision-making |
Number of public, private sector, governments and academia that use NRCan information for decision-making |
6 large federal departments, 5 private sector agencies, 3 Canadian universities by March 31, 2014 |
NRCan met its target through federal departments, private sector agencies and Canadian universities using NRCan geo-information for decision-making |
|
Percentage of clients who are satisfied with Canada's legal boundary framework for effective governance, economic and social development |
Positive trend on bi-annual client satisfaction surveys (rotational amongst key client groups: Aboriginal, other government departments, industry)-Baseline years ending 2013-14, by March 31, 2015 |
Canada Lands Surveyors was incorporated into the 2013-14 evaluation of the Canada's Legal Boundaries Program; findings reported a general level of satisfaction. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
In 2013-14, NRCan produced essential geographic information such as maps, provided expertise on Canada’s legal boundaries, and provided coordinated logistical support in the North through its sub-programs. These activities enabled stakeholders to make informed decisions on the management of Canada’s lands and natural resources and to mitigate related risks.
NRCan met its target of information dissemination for decision-making in 2013-14. A myriad of organizations, including industry, academia and other governments in Canada and federal departments, drew on NRCan geographic expertise to make decisions. For example, Public Safety Canada made flood maps and Parks Canada determined ecosystem integrity of National Parks. Although satisfaction levels related to NRCan’s efforts through this program cannot be easily determined, the findings of a 2013 evaluation reported a continuing need for the program and a general level of satisfaction amongst stakeholders.
Sub-Program 3.2.1: Essential Geographic Information
Description
Many socio-economic and environmental decisions, such as land-use, elections planning, emergency preparedness and response, transportation and real estate, would generate inconsistency, disputes or turmoil without authoritative geographic information. This Sub-program delivers Canada's fundamental geodetic reference system, remote sensing technologies and authoritative mapping, earth observation and other location-based products and solutions. NRCan’s policies, infrastructure and products support a variety of socio-economic and environmental decision-making carried out by other departments and levels of government, private sector and academia as well as the public necessary for effective management of Canada’s natural resources and lands.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 22,587,498 | 49,678,759 | 27,091,261 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to budget reallocation. Expenditures planned for sub-program 2.3.5 Earth Observation for the Revitalization of Antennas were subsequently spent in sub-program 3.2.1 Essential Geographic Information. In addition, funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea; spending related to collective bargaining increases, the operating budget carry forward and costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 317 | 253 | (64) |
The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs relates to an FTE re-allocation which moved FTEs that were planned for sub-program 3.2.1 Essential Geographic Information to various other sub-programs, such as 2.3.5 Earth Observation for Responsible Development of Natural Resources.
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Public, private sector and academia access geographic/geospatial information for the management of natural resources and lands |
Number of downloads for geographic and geospatial information (geo-information) |
5% increase over 2010-11 baseline of 5,495,869 downloads, by March 31, 2014 |
For fiscal year 2013-14, files downloaded from the GeoGratis and GeoBase sites increased to a total of 7,056,376, up from the baseline number of 5,495,869 set in 2010-11. This represents an increase of approximately 28% over the last 3 years, or 9% per year, on average. In addition to downloads, NRCan delivers dynamic geospatial information through its Precise Point Positioning (PPP) service, which served 6751 clients, a 30% increase over the number of clients served in the 2010-11 baseline year. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan’s geographic and geospatial information continued to be accessed and used by the public, private sector and academia in 2013-14, exceeding targets. For example, the number of clients who used NRCan's online Precise Point Positioning (PPP) service, which relays specific, centimetre-level positioning data, increased by 30% from 2010-11 to 2013-14. The service was used primarily by industry and academia for land surveying, engineering, natural resources and geospatial projects and to support research and development. Other geographic resources run by NRCan, GeoGratis and GeoBase, also exceeded their download targets. In addition to managing and acquiring new data sets, NRCan completed work on redesigning data production activities to support the implementation of the Federal Geospatial Platform (FGP). It also built key software and systems components for the FGP, such as a spatially referenced database.
NRCan’s Earth Observation satellite revitalization project is on track, on budget and on time, and significant milestones have been met: the first of four antennas is already in operation (Saskatchewan), a second one is almost completed (Quebec), and the remaining milestones are on track. The initial expansion of the earth observation infrastructure in Inuvik (Northwest Territories) has received positive support from all stakeholders, including the local government. In addition, the facility has attracted interest from national and international satellite service providers, and could become a major satellite destination. As such, NRCan is looking to advance its business operations and partnerships with the international community, building a more robust governance structure going forward through implementation of lessons learned.
Through this sub-program, NRCan also supported Canada’s work to achieve international recognition of an extended continental shelf in accordance with the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. NRCan achieved its target for the Atlantic component of the submission, outlining an extended continental shelf for the Atlantic of 1.2 million km2 (about the size of Ontario). This partial submission is important, as it is a key step in achieving international recognition for Canada's extended continental shelf. The Arctic component was completed in draft form; additional scientific data in the vicinity of the North Pole will be acquired with the intent to file, at a later date, a partial submission for the Arctic Ocean, including the North Pole.
Sub-Program 3.2.2: Canada’s Legal Boundaries
Description
Boundary uncertainty undermines public confidence in the property rights system and is a barrier to exercising property and sovereign rights, as well as responsible social and economic development. For the benefit of all Canadians, this Sub-program ensures boundary certainty through: a) the proper maintenance of the Canada/US international boundary for law enforcement, land administration, customs and immigration, and trans-boundary resource management; b) effective boundary surveys of Aboriginal settlement lands to meet Canada's obligations under land claim settlement legislation and treaties; and c) statutory registration of legal surveys on Canada Lands (the North, Canada's offshore area, Aboriginal Lands and National Parks), essential to the creation of property parcels. The boundary certainty provided by this Sub-program promotes public confidence, enables effective management of Canada lands and collaboration across jurisdictions, which advances the interests of Canada`s natural resources sectors, both domestically and internationally.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 14,558,397 | 14,613,585 | 55,188 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to a surplus as a result of delays in staffing actions and resultant delays in Northern relocations, offset by funding related to the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases, as well as costs recoverable from Treasury Board, which have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 123 | 114 | (9) |
The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs relates to several unplanned staffing departures and ongoing staffing processes which have not been completed.
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Statutory obligations, including interdepartmental commitments, are achieved in support of boundary certainty for Canada (including the Canada-US boundary) and First Nations Lands |
Percentage (cumulative) of International Boundary Maintenance Canada-US obligations on joint plan that are achieved |
55% (over 15 years), by March 31, 2014 |
The joint annual work plan as negotiated by the Canadian and US Sections of the International Boundary Commission was delivered in support of the 15 year boundary maintenance cycle. For the Canadian Section, 559 km were inspected, 455 monuments maintained, 87.7 km cleared and 239 stations surveyed. |
|
Percentage of statutory obligations and interdepartmental commitments achieved as defined in the legislation and agreements for Canada and First Nation lands |
100% achieved per Surveyor General Branch's annual plan, by March 31, 2014 |
The annual survey obligations were met for both the Tlicho and Yukon Comprehensive Land Claim agreements as planned for the fiscal year. Survey related work set out in 37 Interdepartmental Agreements with other government departments was completed. Results include 6,687 cadastral parcels created in the cadastral database. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
NRCan contributed to maintaining the integrity of Canada’s boundaries, in accordance with statutory obligations and interdepartmental commitments. For example, NRCan continued to survey Canadian lands, including First Nations land, as part of land claims, in 2013-14. As well, it met all of the Department’s annual survey obligations for both the Tlicho and Yukon Comprehensive Land Claim agreements. Canada’s partnership with the United States through the International Boundary Commission and that organization’s maintenance plan also yielded results that kept NRCan on track to meet its targets for maintaining boundary markers, inspecting the border and stations, and clearing overgrown sections. This contributed to the confidence of Canadians and natural resource companies in property rights.
Related to Canada's Legal Boundaries program, NRCan completed a two year re-engineering and modernization exercise. The exercise included relocation of its northern plan review and digital data management processes to Edmonton and Ottawa in accordance with Budget 2012. This was undertaken to expedite modernization of the survey system, ensure relevance and create operational efficiencies. However, the Department retained the regional program delivery structure to continue to provide front line services to Canadians and the regional presence effectively contributed to the success of meeting obligations.
Sub-Program 3.2.3: Polar Continental Shelf Logistics Support
Description
Due to the remoteness, harsh weather, and high cost of working in Canada's Arctic and Sub-arctic regions, there is a need to provide safe, efficient and cost-effective field logistics support to researchers throughout these regions. As a national service delivery organization, Polar Continental Shelf Program (PCSP) coordinates logistics for Canadian government agencies, provincial, territorial and northern organizations, universities and independent groups conducting research, in Canada's North. Through this work, the PCSP contributes directly to the exercise of Canadian Arctic sovereignty. PCSP services include air transportation to and from remote field camps, field equipment and vehicles, and fuel for aircraft, equipment and camps. PCSP also provides meals, accommodations and working space (including a multi-purpose laboratory) at its facility in Resolute, NU and a communications network that links the PCSP with the science teams in field camps.
| 2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Actual Spending |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 7,354,843 | 9,535,887 | 2,181,044 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to transfers from the Department of National Defence for the Polar Continental Shelf Program – Canadian Armed Forces Arctic Training Centre project, the operating budget carry forward, and spending related to collective bargaining increases. Furthermore, costs recoverable from Treasury Board have increased actual spending.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 21 | 27 | 6 |
| Expected Results | Performance Indicators | Targets | Actual Results |
|---|---|---|---|
|
Polar Continental Shelf Program clients receive cost-effective field logistics support |
Percentage of eligible projects receiving sufficient PCSP support to proceed with their field work |
95% by March 31, 2014 |
The Polar Continental Shelf Program had prioritized and supported 273 of the 323 eligible project requests received. Another 29 projects were cancelled, leaving only 21 projects unsupported. Therefore 273 out of the 294 or 93% of the projects were supported. |
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Through the Polar Continental Shelf Program, NRCan provided vital logistics support to government departments and agencies, academia and other stakeholder groups conducting science in Canada’s North. In 2013-14, NRCan was able to support 93% of all project requests it had received, providing safe, efficient and cost-effective logistics services in support of science and Government priorities.
During the 2013 field season, NRCan supported 129 science projects in the Arctic requiring field logistics support. The Department provided 3,355 person-days of accommodation for scientists at its facility in Resolute, Nunavut, and supported 155 projects with field equipment across Canada through its Technical Field Support Services unit. NRCan also helped Canada exert its sovereignty by supporting eight projects and providing 5,390 person-days of accommodation for National Defence Arctic training projects.
The Department implemented improvements to its business processes in line with an internal audit of the PCSP completed in 2013. These improvements are part of NRCan’s work to have its PCSP work recognized, both domestically and internationally, as Canada's Centre of Excellence for logistics support over the Canadian land mass with a strong emphasis on contributing to the performance of science and the exercise of sovereignty in the Canadian North. The improvements will also enable NRCan to provide turn-key logistics solutions to the Geo-mapping for Energy and Minerals (GEM-2) program and the Canadian High Arctic Research Station’s science and technology program.
Internal Services
Description
Internal Services are groups of related activities and resources that are administered to support the needs of programs and other corporate obligations of an organization. These groups are: Management and Oversight Services; Communications Services; Legal Services; Human Resources Management Services; Financial Management Services; Information Management Services; Information Technology Services; Real Property Services; Materiel Services; Acquisition Services; and Other Administrative Services. Internal Services include only those activities and resources that apply across an organization and not to those provided specifically to a program.
| 2013-14 Main Estimates |
2013-14 Planned Spending |
2013-14 Total Authorities Available for Use |
2013-14 Actual Spending (authorities used) |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 155,810,360 | 155,861,957 | 198,477,192 | 184,198,094 | 28,336,137 |
The difference between Planned Spending and Actual Spending is mainly attributed to the funding received through Supplementary Estimates related to the Government Advertising Campaign, the Stakeholder Engagement and Outreach Campaign, the Port Hope Area Initiative, the Geo-Mapping for Energy and Minerals project, and the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, as well as for the operating budget carry forward and spending related to collective bargaining increases. In addition, spending originally planned for other programs that was subsequently spent in Internal Services, as well as costs recoverable from Treasury Board, have increased actual spending. Offsetting these increases in funding are surpluses in corporate areas as well as a return of funds to the Privy Council Office for the Government Advertising program.
| 2013-14 Planned |
2013-14 Actual |
2013-14 Difference (actual minus planned) |
|---|---|---|
| 1,069 | 1,029 | (40) |
The difference between Planned FTEs and Actual FTEs relates to the continued efforts to reduce personnel through attrition.
Performance Analysis and Lessons Learned
Responding to its operating context, best practices observed in other departments, central agency directives and requirements, and internal innovations to process, NRCan achieved numerous significant milestones in 2013-14.
NRCan streamlined its people management processes and made them more effective. For example, it achieved all Treasury Board Secretariat-required deliverables for the Common Human Resources Business Process ahead of the scheduled deadline of March 31, 2014, allowing for a standardized and integrated approach to human resources. Regarding its codes and action plans, NRCan made progress on implementing its new Values and Ethics Code, and fulfilling actions identified in its Official Languages and Employment Equity action plans. NRCan also continued efforts related to performance and talent management, leadership development and strengthening management capacity.
NRCan met several milestones related to information and document management processes and tools in 2013-14. These included the launch of the new consolidated Departmental website, which replaced the existing collection of branch, sector and corporate websites. The new, smaller web presence allows for enhanced navigation and usability in accordance with the Standard on Web Usability. The Department completed some of its information management-related priorities. Key milestones related to the GCDOCS document management tool were completed in 2013-14, including the development and establishment of the GCDOCS environment, functional testing, development of the departmental information architecture, completion of pilots, resolution of some system performance issues, and partial implementation in some of NRCan’s organizational units.
Finally, the Departmental Investment Plan was approved by the Treasury Board in September 2013. The Plan will allow for strategic capital investments to be made to its cross-Canada scientific and office facilities. NRCan also began work to streamline the implementation of investment planning and reporting.
Page details
- Date modified: